Never mind the pajamas … We blog in the nude!

Archive for the ‘TerrorAsses’ Category

Annoying Liberals

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 29, 2007

It’s been a while since we’ve had a liberal around for intelligent discourse. Of late, though, we have had a barking moonbat who seems to get his talking points from Cindy Sheehag, MoveOn and the “Truthers”. OK, well so much for intelligent discourse, but there’s always fun to be had slapping a lib around with the Immortal Cluebat, especially one that comes to a gun fight armed with a slingshot.

These liberals have no concept of reality. They love to tell you that constitutionalists are a dying breed, and wow, what a great thing that is. They love to tell you President Reagan was a moron, despite all his achievements while in office. They love to tell you that war is illegal. In a nutshell, to them the laughable is reality, and reality is, well, they wouldn’t know reality if it slapped them in the face.

How many liberals do you know that encourage race-baiting, giving their full support to racist statements and diatribes that come from the likes of Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, and Robert Byrd?

How many liberals do you know that champion the “rights” of millions of illegal aliens who refuse to obey our laws, organize violent gangs in our country, and have openly asserted that America is part of THEIR country that they are going to take back?

How many liberals do you know that openly believe that the purpose of government is to provide the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens?

How many liberals do you know that are so completely taken over with Bush Derangement Syndrome that they can’t help but blame this President for everything that they see as wrong, including high gas prices?

How many liberals do you know that openly try to accuse the president of starting a war for personal gain (implying that any gains should be redistributed to the people)?

How many liberals do you know that openly advocate nationalizing everything from health care to the price of milk?

How many liberals do you know that openly advocate high taxes so that they can decide who to give the money to?

How many liberals do you know that expect the rest of us to assume that everything can and should be done by the federal government?

How many liberals do you know that treat wealthy people and their money with disdain?

How many liberals do you know that expect the federal government to run all of the schools?

How many liberals do you know that justify the imposition of their socialist agenda by invoking children?

How many liberals do you know that constantly bemoan anyone’s practice of religious freedom?

How many liberals do you know that want a centralized government to run all of the above?

These are all things about liberals that annoy me. What’s worse is that many of them come here championing these things with no idea how ridiculous they are being by doing so, and refuse to engage in a meaningful discussion of any issues. It’s all a bunch of name-calling and lying on their part.

Constitutionalists are part of a growing movement in America. A movement that is marked by recognition of the failed socialist policies of the 20th century and a desire to champion the ideals of the Founding Fathers. A great thing indeed, and lucky for us, the libs don’t even see it coming.

President Reagan was a genius, and an immensely popular one at that. Demonizing him only discredits the liberals. It’s a fool’s game to label a man a moron when he virtually single-handedly brought down the most evil empire the world had ever seen (ok ok … Marge and JP helped … ), brought a balanced budget to within reach by cutting taxes, and was smart enough to find a way to win re-election with almost a clean sweep.

Wars are going to happen. It’s a simple fact of the world. No one likes them, but when you are attacked by ruthless warriors, you must respond as ruthless warriors. The best way to prevent war is to be more prepared for it than your enemies and be prepared to prove it when they test you. Mr. Bush’s unpopularity with regard to the war is not a positive response to cronies like Cindy Sheehag who oppose the war because the guy at the helm is less of a socialist than they are, but because he stopped fighting long before it was appropriate to do so. He failed to cut off the hand that was feeding the terrorists, as an Iraqi friend of mine once suggested. This president’s willingness to answer the terrorists’ declaration of war with rockets and bombs is admirable. His failure to keep fighting as appropriate is his downfall in this regard.

Of course, no liberal will ever admit that – at least publicly; but watch the leading Donk presidential candidates put forth their plans for the War on Terror, and listen closely to what they will entail. You’re not going to be looking at a cut-n-run strategy from any of them that really want to win.

Libs are annoying. Funny, but annoying. Some of the best laughs I have ever had have come at the expense of liberals being stupid. Remember when Bill Clinton came on TV and told all of America that the Blizzard of ’96 was caused by “global warming”?? I almost suffocated that day.

Funny, but annoying.



Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Idiocy Revisited

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 10, 2007

Well, surfing about this afternoon, I came across this:

What a gas!

Let’s have a little fun with this, shall we?

People are dying in a war based on inaccurate facts.

OK. Someone hand this idiot a dictionary, and quick.

Facts, by definition are NOT inaccurate. And what facts are you disputing anyway? Osama bin Laden ordered the massacre of thousands of Americans, and we are to sit idly by? Saddam Hussein offers big cash rewards to the families of suicide bombers for killing Americans, and we are supposed to just laugh it up?

These people are against disarming the likes of bin Laden and Hussein, but they have absolutely NO PROBLEM with advocating laws that disarm innocent Americans who have a legally protected right to arm themselves. What kind of fucked up logic is that???

Our government is corrupt.

Go figure. So is every other government that has existed in the history of this world. Are you going to tell me that the Bush Administration is more corrupt than the Hussein regime?? Get real.

Gas prices still keep going up.

Blame that on liberal enviro-nut regulation. Hey, if your corrupt government officials gave two shits about your gas prices, they could shave 18 cents per gallon off the price TOMORROW with ONE VOTE. Instead they complain about how Americans are selfish with their energy use. What fucking hypocrites.

Homes are being destroyed in natural disasters.

Um … What exactly is your point here? Are you trying to say that living in an area prone to, say, earthquakes, doesn’t make your home a target for destruction by mother nature? If someone builds a house in a flood zone, he runs the risk of losing his home in a flood … even if he buys flood insurance – go figure.

It’s just that damned Mother Nature. If we would all just drive hybrids, she just might stop tearing up our towns with tornadoes, floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes. Are we seeing the lunacy here yet?

Children are being abused by their families.

So what’s your answer?? Taking all the kids from their parents so the government can abuse them even more? Is there anyone left that buys this bleeding heart bullshit?

The local pedophile may be a priest.

He/she may also be a teacher, principal, bartender, automobile salesman, garbage truck driver, secretary, or dentist. What exactly is your point?

Poverty still exists even though we are the richest nation in the world.

Again, SO FUCKING WHAT? We are also the country with the most opportunity for those same impoverished people to overcome that poverty. The fact that they choose not to isn’t anyone’s fault but their own.

There is still no cure for AIDS.

Nope there isn’t – and there’s also no cure for heart disease or lung cancer, both of which are more dangerous and innocently spread than AIDS. Yet how much more attention (and unconstitutional money) does AIDS get, even though it’s spread behaviorally?

Yet another Bush could still become our President.

With your luck, it’ll be Jenna. I wonder why you’re not so worried about an anti-American socialist named Hitlery becoming president … That would be “another” Clinton, and a much more dangerous one at that.

All this and you’re still going to focus on my sexuality?

I haven’t said anything about your sexuality. Quite frankly, I couldn’t give two shits.

Someone smack this moron.


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, RWR in the 'Sphere, RWRants, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Moonbat Monitor Socks it to Calderon

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 4, 2007

Moonbat Monitor has done it again.

In response to Farks wannabe Felipe Calderon’s assertions that Mexico has no borders, Moonbat Monitor hit back with this:

Dear Mr. Calderon,

I feel it is my duty to advise you of an invention from long ago that is still used to this very day. This amazing invention is called a “map.” On this “map” thing, you will in fact see that although there might be Mexicans here in the US, it is not in fact Mexico. You see, there are these line thingys on “maps” called “borders,” and when looking at these “borders,” you will notice your country ends at one point and ours begins. Therefore realizing this, I think it would be appropriate for you to amend or retract your statements in regards to your country never ending. They’re wrong. My map says so. And perhaps you can have one of the millions of your citizens that have invaded our country shoplift one of these fancy “maps” and send it to you so you can fully understand this concept.

Sarcastically and not so respectfully,

-Moonbat Monitor.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

My words for Mr. Calderon are a little simpler:

If you have a problem with the US making and enforcing our own laws, shut the fuck up and declare war already. The US could use a little more land to the south, your subjects in Mexico would wind up with all the rights of real US citizens – and without the oppressive socialism they come to America to escape, and defending a border with Belize and Guatemala would be considerably easier than this long border we have right now.

Go ahead – IF you think you can win.


Update 9/7: Moonbat Monitor has been honored as an Honorable Soldier of the RWRmy for his appropriate treatment of liberals … More to come …

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, New FedeRWRalism, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

One Year Later

Posted by RightWingRocker on August 25, 2007

I swung by today before typing my class notes for the week and noticed I had as many hits as I would typically have had on an average blogging day – and I haven’t had an average day blogging for quite some time. I realized that a year had passed since the last time I posted about having won that bet with Freder_Frederson, and figured some people may have come by to see if I had anything to say about it.

Not that I have much to say. CENTCOM still isn’t reporting anything about a civil war raging in Iraq, Bryan has been quiet (and I do know that he’s been re-deployed somewhere, possibly even Iraq), Omar’s most recent mention of it was this past June, and it went something like this:

For over a year the media and many officials were spooking us with the exaggerated ghost of civil war.

Mohammed, also this past June:

Attacking the Askari shrine for the second time emphasizes how those who ordered the attacks have been betting their money on this tactic to spark civil war in Iraq.

So … Still no civil war in Iraq.  And, of course, still no steak dinner from Freder.  No surprise.  For Freder, the civil war started the day President Bush took the Oath of Office.

All this talk of civil war was for the purpose of discrediting the President.  Why not discredit him for laying off Iran and Syria?  Why not discredit him for refusing to secure the borders?  After all, if you want to discredit President Bush, those are two areas in which he is particularly vulnerable.

Of course, the answer to those questions is simple.  Liberals are even LESS credible on those issues than the President.  The criticism he gets from Iraqis isn’t from dethroning Saddam or failing to contain the terrorists there.  The Iraqis are all too aware that these kinds of problems were going to exist.  Iraqis complain that President Bush didn’t cut off the “insurgency” at its source (Iran and Syria), not that he dethroned Saddam.

The libs are also on the same side as the President when it comes to securing the borders.  They’re mostly for amnesty and against fencing off the Southern border.  They’re just as fucked up as the President when it comes to that as well.

Still, imagine what we would have had with a President Gore or Fuckweasel.  I shudder to think.  I’ll take ANY of the candidates running for the Republican nomination over Hitlery or Barack the Schlock, and you can rest assured that that’s where the Donks are headed – right into Hitlery’s concentration camp.  I’ll take eight years of a liberal Republican over her socialism any day – better to complain about the erosion of rights over time and have it eventually be reversible than to have to live under a Hitlery regime that could possibly convince America to give up our sacred Constitution and never go away.  If you don’t think Hitlery is capable of that, you had better look again.

She and people like Freder are the greatest threat our Constitution has faced in the history of our Republic.


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit, RWR in the 'Sphere, RWRandom Thoughts, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Civil War in Iraq

Posted by RightWingRocker on June 7, 2007

Well it seems Freder_Frederson finally got his civil war in Iraq.

Too bad for him it’s just terrorists fighting each other over something neither of them really controls.

Yup, the Shi’ites have been hanging in there in trying to establish something that may resemble (on some level) a free nation, and the Sunnis and al-Qaeda have obviously been so frustrated with their resolve that they’ve taken to fighting each other.

Who was it that said they wouldn’t advocate the US sending soldiers into Iraq for purposes of containing a civil war?  I say just get everyone else out of the war zone and let the terrorists all kill each other – then drop a bomb on those that are left.  For a civil war that was supposed to force us to turn tail and run, this is really awfully funny.  They’re saving us billions of dollars in ammunition and countless lives.  All in the process of annihilating themselves so that we can achieve our victory with them doing all the work for us.

Somebody please pass the popcorn.


Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Funny Shit, KABOOM!, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Answers for Ol’ BC

Posted by RightWingRocker on June 6, 2007

Ol’ BC first came to the RWRepublic in its infancy. Since then, he is without question the most loyal reader I have. Last night, he posted some interesting questions in the wake of the incredible waste of time that passed for a debate. There were, of course, largely obvious answers to all of them, so I figured, Why not …

Do the Democrats who are running REALLY think they represent the views of a majority of Americans?

Yup. They think Americans are stupid socialist idiots who not only believe that they have no clue whatsoever how to run their own lives, but that they need a Barack the Schlock or a Hitlery to run it for them. They really believe that the backlash against President Bush is because he’s a Republican and not because he’s nearly as liberal as they are. Why else would they be promising all this stuff that no one really needs or wants?

If the U.S. pulls out of Iraq, do some of these candidates REALLY think the Islamic terrorists are just going to terrorize one another and leave the non-Muslims alone?

Worse. They think the terrorists will cease to be terrorists and live quiet, happy lives sitting around campfires singing “Kum Ba Ya”. They think that only Americans are capable of greed and selfishness and that making everyone’s situation the same (poverty by force if necessary) will lead to peace. They think that they are the only people who are capable of making anyone happy, and that even the terrorists will “see the light” if only we just appease them (Neville Chamberlain was unfortunately unavailable for comment).

How are the deaths of those in the Darfur region different than the hundreds of thousands of deaths of Arabs and Kurds under Saddam Hussein?

In one very important, but nonetheless rather irrelevant way. What’s going on in Darfur is actually a bona-fide Civil War, unlike anything we’ve seen in Iraq.

Pro-choice versus Pro-life, what’s with the exceptions? If I was born in 1955 or 1975 as the result of a pregnancy by rape or incest or if my mother died during childbirth, am I less of a person than the majority of the other people? If not, why the exceptions? Is a fetus a life or not at conception? At one month? At two months? Are most pro-lifers only part time?

Every American grapples with this issue, whether pro-life or pro-child murder. No child is any less a person just because he/she is still in the womb. The reason we make exceptions has to do with violation of the rights of the mother. It’s very difficult to reconcile this. If it is clear that the mother is going to die from carrying the baby to term (an EXTREMELY RARE situation), then her God-given right to life is threatened, and we have a responsibility to protect it. How do we also protect the baby’s similar God-given right? At this time, we are in the unfortunate position of not having any idea. In the interests of preserving her family unit, and with the understanding that one of these very important people (the mother or the baby) is going to die, we make a choice as to whom we save. In choosing to save the mother, we preserve her ability to bring more children into the world in the future, and we save her family from the emotional and economic disaster that might have followed. Nonetheless, we grieve the loss of the child.

As to rape and incest, we make these allowances as a peace offering to the pro-murder crowd. Of course, it’s gotten us nowhere. The Constitution Party states that we shouldn’t be punishing the child for the sins of his/her father, but if a woman has not consented to the act, then should she be considered to have consented to the pregnancy? Conversely, doesn’t it solidify the pro-life position if the position is taken that by consenting to an act that is known to have pregnancy as a consequence, one has consented to the resulting pregnancy?? After all, that is precisely the position taken by those who advocate a woman killing her baby and simultaneously advocate forcing a father to finance a child’s life against his will should the mother choose life.

What happened to the specific powers granted to the federal government in the constitution? I missed the entire education and healthcare section. There has been a lot of talk about heaping on more and very little about rescinding any. What about all others being reserved for the states? Eerie silence.

Those specific powers are still there, along with a slew of others that have been added illegally by those elected to office with the consent of their constituents. This question is truly what the New Federalism seeks to address. America needs a wake-up call.

Do that many of the candidates REALLY think that if they grant amnesty to illegal aliens already in this country no more are going to sneak in?

Nope. They know all too well what will happen – and it’s exactly what they want. Face it, with all of their support of killing off babies that could have been voting for liberal candidates, they’re running out of people to vote for them. It’s happening a lot faster than they anticipated. Liberals need a new constituency, and if they can import one, all the better for them. Do you really think they are fighting this hard so that these people can vote for conservatives??? If these people seriously cared about bringing more people into the prosperity that is America, they’d be falling all over themselves trying to get large numbers of Israelis to move here so that the terrorists could have the land they want. Why isn’t THAT happening??

It’s not happening because Israelis generally would be voting in favor of fighting off terrorists, lowering taxes, and bringing government back to within its legal limits. They are largely well-educated and well-off. Those they are trying to get your heart to bleed over are largely neither. They’re not looking for people who will be independent. They are looking for people who will need liberals for their well-being.

Have that many of the candidates forgotten that learning English opened doors to success for millions of Germans, Italians, Israelis and scads of others for years and years?

Nope. The problem is that they don’t want those doors to be opened. They want the doors closed so that they can have their little dependency class and force you and me and the rest of America to pay for it.

Why weren’t signs and information printed in eighteen languages for all those years if it is that critical?

Because it’s not critical at all…

Could it actually hold people back and keep them living at a subsistence level?

That is precisely the point, and it’s exactly why there is a move on to force every language but English on all of us. I’m not saying that English is what makes people successful. What I’m saying is that English, by sheer luck of the draw, has been the language of successful people. To be successful in the world today, you ALMOST HAVE TO surround yourself with English-speaking people. Telling those who would otherwise do this that it’s ok not to ultimately slows their success, which is exactly what the liberals want. People who claim to be the smartest people in the world can’t possibly be stupid enough to ignore these facts.

Do people REALLY think that catering to a Palestinian state, whose sole mission in life is the eradication of Israel, is going to lead to peace in the region?

Nope. If they did, they’d be inviting scores of successful Israelis to naturalize as Americans. The real problem is that they are more ideologically inclined with the Islamofascist philosophy espoused by the terrorists than they are with the more liberty-minded philosophy of the Israelis.

How about if that Palestinian state is on land that was previously Israel and is presently adjacent to Israel?

All the more reason to eradicate it, in their opinion. These people value freedom, but only for themselves. Everyone else, including you and I, is expected to take orders from them, Constitution be damned.

Maybe I’ve been listening to Sage a little too much, but I doubt it. Just because I have this cynical outlook on liberals doesn’t mean I’m not an optimist. America’s brightest days are ahead; I’m convinced of that. Still, we must overcome these very dark times when many among us would surrender our constitutional rights and succumb to a socialist regime just because they’re too lazy or ignorant to stand up and fight.


Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere, RWRants, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

This was Fun

Posted by RightWingRocker on June 5, 2007

While studying tonight, I took frequent breaks and followed John Hawkins’s LiveBlog of tonight’s Republican Debate.

What made it most fun was reading the LiveBlog without watching the debate. So John would comment on something someone said without quoting him, and I’d just be reading what he had to say about it. Hilarious!

Well come on. Any Republican debates going on now are a total waste of time and energy for the candidates and for us. Same for the Donks. What does anyone really expect to accomplish NOW? The likely primary winner on the Republican side hasn’t even joined the race, Giuliani and McCain are RINOs, Hunter and Gilmore are nobodies, so are Tommy, Sam, and Huck, and Tanc and Paul are Libertarian nutjobs who will get elected MAYBE if all the liberals in the Democrat and Republican Parties can be killed off in time for the primaries.

It’s all a big joke. We have a war on in this party. Rush is absolutely right about that. We federalist conservatives MUST win it, and BEFORE the primaries, so that there is a true winner standing for the principles of freedom and federalism that have made America great on the ticket to beat Hitlery and Barack the Schlock. This is MUCH more important than these silly irrelevant debates.

The Revolution has begun, and it WILL be televised.

It will be hard work, but saving America from those who would turn it over to the government will be well worth the effort.


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, New FedeRWRalism, RWRandom Thoughts, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Thompson on Memorial Day

Posted by RightWingRocker on May 29, 2007

Students polled in a wide range of colleges and universities showed no real improvement in their historical knowledge. Some actually forgot part of what they’d learned in high school by the time they graduated — and I’m talking about some of our best-known Ivy League schools.Less than half of college seniors knew that, “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal” is from the Declaration of Independence. Less than half knew basic facts about the First Amendment. Half didn’t know that the Federalist Papers were written in support of the Constitution’s ratification. Only a quarter of seniors knew the purpose of the Monroe Doctrine.This is our quandary. Memorial Day is about remembering. It’s about remembering those who died for our country; but it’s also about remembering why they believed it was worth dying for. Too many Americans, though, have never been taught our own history and heritage. How can you remember something that you’ve never learned?

First of all, let me go on record as knowing that the above quote is from the Declaration of Independence and that it continues as follows (and this is from memory): “that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”. This blog is my personal expression of the First Amendment, as is my religion. I know not only that the Federalist Papers were written in support of ratification of the Constitution, but that they were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. I also know that the Monroe Doctrine established the policy that the United States would fight any new European intrusion into the Western Hemisphere.

I also must say that I find it absolutely deplorable that any educational institution in this country would deprive any student of the knowledge of the philosophy under which this country was established and the names and backgrounds of those who implemented it.

I am further angered by those who would use a day set aside to honor the nameless soldiers who have given their lives protecting the very First Amendment that protects free speech rights to use that day to use those same free speech rights to demean those nameless soldiers.

If the typical terrorist suicide murderer’s heritage and cause are worth dying for, then why shouldn’t ours be? Is ours not superior? Is it not at a bare minimum worth learning about?


Posted in Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Good Riddance … If Only

Posted by RightWingRocker on May 29, 2007

Expect to find CamoKitty added to the BlogRWRoll in the near future. Her commentary is refreshing, to say the least, especially given my recent comments on the blogosphere. I found her recently as I was clicking around at the Rottie (I REALLY need to spend more time there), and well … Go read her stuff. It’s great.

At the top of her page when I first arrived was this post about Cindy Sheehan (known around here as “Sheehag”). I really have tried not to post about this idiot, largely because she was never really relevant, and all we really got from her was some comic relief. No one ever took her seriously. CamoKitty linked to her post yesterday at Daily Kos, another loony blog that I avoid like the plague just because it’s way too frustrating to know that people that far out of touch with reality actually exist. Still, now that Sheehag has allegedly moved on, perhaps it would be fun to fisk her bitching and moaning about the inevitable coming to pass HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA …

“Good Riddance Attention Whore”
by CindySheehan
Mon May 28, 2007 at 09:57:01 AM PDT

I have endured a lot of smear and hatred since Casey was killed and especially since I became the so-called “Face” of the American anti-war movement. Especially since I renounced any tie I have remaining with the Democratic Party, I have been further trashed on such “liberal blogs” as the Democratic Underground. Being called an “attention whore” and being told “good riddance” are some of the more milder rebukes.

The “American anti-war movement” was doomed without your face, Cindy. You just sped up the process. Why are you surprised that you are being called an attention whore by the libs? We conservatives have been calling you that from the get-go. Just goes to show how far behind the curve the Left really is.

You see, Mrs. Sheehag, as I’ve said in comments on many blogs in the blogosphere, the left and the “anti-war movement” (I’ve had bowel movements more powerful) were only using you. As soon as you were of no more use to them, they discarded you just as I predicted they would. Good riddance, indeed. Oh, and while you’re bitching and moaning, why not get a handle on the English language? I don’t know if I can handle reading this whole thing if you’re going to be dropping dumbed-down phrases like “more milder”.

I have come to some heartbreaking conclusions this Memorial Day Morning. These are not spur of the moment reflections, but things I have been meditating on for about a year now. The conclusions that I have slowly and very reluctantly come to are very heartbreaking to me.

Poor fucking baby. The heartbreaking conclusions that you still are missing is that the world is a better place without your socialist agenda and that war is a fact of life. Spare me the whining. Wait, don’t. I need a good laugh.

The first conclusion is that I was the darling of the so-called left as long as I limited my protests to George Bush and the Republican Party. Of course, I was slandered and libeled by the right as a “tool” of the Democratic Party. This label was to marginalize me and my message. How could a woman have an original thought, or be working outside of our “two-party” system?

HAHA … This is exactly what I’ve been saying about you all along, Sheehag. As soon as you were no longer of any use to the Democrats, they would toss you out with the bathwater. And you WERE a tool of the Democratic Party. That’s not libel. For proof, answer this question: What do you do with a tool you no longer have any use for? Eh. You obviously have a problem thinking on that level, so I’ll answer it for you: YOU THROW IT THE FUCK OUT! Just like the Donks did to you. Get over yourself. You and your message were marginal at best to begin with. There was nothing “original” about anything you were saying. We’d heard it all before in the 1960s.

However, when I started to hold the Democratic Party to the same standards that I held the Republican Party, support for my cause started to erode and the “left” started labeling me with the same slurs that the right used. I guess no one paid attention to me when I said that the issue of peace and people dying for no reason is not a matter of “right or left”, but “right and wrong.”

Yup. And you were wrong. Your slurs have been earned, Mrs. Sheehag. They’ve been well-earned; and if you can’t take the heat, you don’t belong in the kitchen.

I am deemed a radical because I believe that partisan politics should be left to the wayside when hundreds of thousands of people are dying for a war based on lies that is supported by Democrats and Republican alike. It amazes me that people who are sharp on the issues and can zero in like a laser beam on lies, misrepresentations, and political expediency when it comes to one party refuse to recognize it in their own party. Blind party loyalty is dangerous whatever side it occurs on. People of the world look on us Americans as jokes because we allow our political leaders so much murderous latitude and if we don’t find alternatives to this corrupt “two” party system our Representative Republic will die and be replaced with what we are rapidly descending into with nary a check or balance: a fascist corporate wasteland. I am demonized because I don’t see party affiliation or nationality when I look at a person, I see that person’s heart. If someone looks, dresses, acts, talks and votes like a Republican, then why do they deserve support just because he/she calls him/herself a Democrat?

You are deemed a radical because you stand for radical things. Your letter to the President is proof of that. You politicized the war and your son’s death for your own socialist cause. The Donks are still fighting for that cause, but they no longer can use the war as a political football in their effort to implement these things. Just because you think politicizing the war is still the way to go doesn’t mean those responsible for fighting it agree. This is more proof that the Democrat win in 2006 wasn’t a victory for liberals as much as it was for change in general. Anti-war Democrats teamed up with pro-war ones to win the election, and now they have to pay the piper. Truth hurts, doesn’t it, Cindy? Never mind that the socialism you support is one of the fastest ways possible to the very fascist wasteland you bemoan.

I have also reached the conclusion that if I am doing what I am doing because I am an “attention whore” then I really need to be committed.

This is EXACTLY what I’ve been saying all along, and I know I’m not alone. Never mind the fisk. I’m going to start skipping stuff.

I have spent every available cent I got from the money a “grateful” country gave me when they killed my son and every penny that I have received in speaking or book fees since then.

Your son was killed in battle, Mrs. Sheehag. He is an honorable man. I cannot say the same for a mother who spends “every available cent” (including a $250,000 life insurance payment) on an idiotic anti-war cause and leaves the grave of the very man whose name she invokes in the effort looking like this:

No headstone. Deplorable.

I have sacrificed a 29 year marriage and have traveled for extended periods of time away from Casey’s brother and sisters and my health has suffered and my hospital bills from last summer (when I almost died) are in collection because I have used all my energy trying to stop this country from slaughtering innocent human beings.

Spare me. Your marriage never meant anything to you, only your love of socialism. That’s why your husband left you – he left you because you are, in a word, looney-tunes.

I have been called every despicable name that small minds can think of and have had my life threatened many times.

And every name large minds can think of, too. And it’s all been earned. Your life threatened? I never heard any of those allegations. I can think of a few soldiers, though, who would jump at the chance to avenge your traitorous deeds.

The most devastating conclusion that I reached this morning, however, was that Casey did indeed die for nothing. His precious lifeblood drained out in a country far away from his family who loves him, killed by his own country which is beholden to and run by a war machine that even controls what we think. I have tried every since he died to make his sacrifice meaningful. Casey died for a country which cares more about who will be the next American Idol than how many people will be killed in the next few months while Democrats and Republicans play politics with human lives. It is so painful to me to know that I bought into this system for so many years and Casey paid the price for that allegiance. I failed my boy and that hurts the most.

Spare me again. This from a so-called “mother” who puts her lame excuse for a “cause” over her own son’s heroism. Let me remind you once again:

Spare me the whining.

I have also tried to work within a peace movement that often puts personal egos above peace and human life. This group won’t work with that group; he won’t attend an event if she is going to be there; and why does Cindy Sheehan get all the attention anyway? It is hard to work for peace when the very movement that is named after it has so many divisions.

It’s also hard to work for peace when people like Cindy Sheehag get more attention than the honorable soldiers who put their lives on the line every day in the real effort to work for peace.

I am going to take whatever I have left and go home. I am going to go home and be a mother to my surviving children and try to regain some of what I have lost. I will try to maintain and nurture some very positive relationships that I have found in the journey that I was forced into when Casey died and try to repair some of the ones that have fallen apart since I began this single-minded crusade to try and change a paradigm that is now, I am afraid, carved in immovable, unbendable and rigidly mendacious marble.

If I believed this, I’d be doing John Hawkins’ Snoopy dance. Go home, Cindy. Take the time to learn what it means to be a mother. Get close to your friends. Vote for the socialists. It’s all your right. What makes this sad is that we on the right knew all along that the “peace movement” and the Democrats were just using you, and that when they were finished with you, they’d just toss you aside. Had you listened to us, you might have had a chance to salvage some of your son’s honor that you destroyed in his name. Had you listened to us, you might already be home, knowing what it means to be a mother, close to your friends, and voting for socialists. Had you listened to us, your phony cries of grief may have had some credibility.

Of course, you haven’t listened to us. Perhaps that’s what hurts you the most now, eh Cindy? Your adversaries were right all along. We scorned you. We made fun of you. We made fun of you, and then made fun of you some more. From the beginning, we saw you for the fool that you are, and we called you on it. Well, in the words of Hart and Stilgoe …

Pity comes too late. Turn around and face your fate: an eternity of this before your eyes.

(from The Phantom of the Opera)

Camp Casey has served its purpose. It’s for sale. Anyone want to buy five beautiful acres in Crawford , Texas ? I will consider any reasonable offer. I hear George Bush will be moving out soon, too…which makes the property even more valuable.

Can’t get by without a little Bush-bashing, eh, Cindy? So much for pity.

This is my resignation letter as the “face” of the American anti-war movement. This is not my “Checkers” moment, because I will never give up trying to help people in the world who are harmed by the empire of the good old US of A, but I am finished working in, or outside of this system. This system forcefully resists being helped and eats up the people who try to help it. I am getting out before it totally consumes me or anymore people that I love and the rest of my resources.

Sheehag has a point or two here. Of course, she means it in a way that’s not really the truth, and she misses the real point entirely. She wants to “help” America by turning it into a socialist shithole. Maybe the system “forcefully resisting being helped” can work out to being a good thing. Oh, and do get out before it totally consumes you – oh yeah, that already happened, duh. And spare me the “people that I love” crap, Cindy. There’s only one person you love, and you already mentioned her.

Oh, and how about diverting some of your “remaining resources” here while you’re at it:

I would think that would have been taken care of sooner, but that’s just me.

Good-bye America …you are not the country that I love and I finally realized no matter how much I sacrifice, I can’t make you be that country unless you want it.

It’s up to you now.

Good-bye Cindy. Thanks for the laughs. America will never be the country you love. You’d be much better off in Cuba. We Americans DEFINITELY don’t want that. We want the free America Casey gave his life for; the America that was the subject of the Founders’ hopes and dreams. That will never be your America.

Again, thanks for the laughs. Enjoy your new home life, IF you can keep it.


Posted in Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, RWRants, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

The Real Front in the War on Terror

Posted by RightWingRocker on March 28, 2007

It’s been a while since I stopped by Iraq the Model, my favorite Iraqi blog, hosted by Omar and Mohammed, two brothers who live in the Baghdad area.

Mohammed posted this on Friday.  Go read it.  I’ll wait …


Good.  Now my question is this:

If someone living on the ground in Iraq gets it, why don’t so many of those whose countrymen were killed on September 11, 2001?



Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, RWR in the 'Sphere, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Presidential Candidates …

Posted by RightWingRocker on March 2, 2007

Let’s face it.

The current crop of “Presidential candidates” sucks. REALLY sucks – and I mean on both sides of the aisle.

You have basically two choices now. You can either support a socialist nutjob like Hitlery or Osama Obama, or you can support a RINO like John McCain. If you want someone with any sense of federalism, you can support Ron Paul, but expect to have to cut and run in the War on Terror.

The measure of a good candidate is best summed up in a post I wrote last year:

Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:48 AM

Rocker for President

Not really.

But I have, from time to time, thought about what my priorities would be if I were to run, and ultimately, to win and become President of the United States. Of course, I’m sure everyone gets a thought or two like that during the course of a lifetime.

As President, there are a few things I would try to accomplish.

* Real border security. I would take drastic measures to stop as many illegal aliens from entering the country as possible, while simultaneously deporting any illegal aliens found about the country. This goes for all illegal aliens, regardless of their nation of origin. If a wall were to become necessary, I would support its building with expenditures as provided for in the Constitution.

* Federalism. I would start be reinstating President Reagan’s EO 12612 and insist upon its full implementation. I would supplement this EO with orders that the constitutionality of all federal programs be reviewed, and real plans for dismantling any and all unconstitutional operations, departments, and/or programs be submitted. I would further seek to implement as much of the New Federalist platform as possible, except where I have indicated in these posts that I am in disagreement with the New Federalists.

* Fiscal responsibility. With the dismantling of unconstitutional operations described above, plenty of money would be made available as a down-payment on the national debt. Simplification of the tax code and tax cuts for all Americans would stimulate the economy, increasing federal receipts and making deficits unnecessary. There would be plenty of money to fund constitutional operations, including military and national security operations, AND provide tax cuts, AND make significant payments toward the national debt, with the ultimate goal of retiring it completely.

* Terrorism. All nations sponsoring terrorism would be put on notice: Knock it the fuck off or da Rocker gonna rock your world. I’m not sure I would necessarily turn Iran into a glass parking lot, but I would definitely finish the job of training the Afghan and Iraqi militaries as quickly as possible, so that Iran could easily be attacked simultaneously from both the east and west. Syria would be a major target after that, as would North Korea, and any other nation that chooses to threaten the American people with violence. I would invoke the threat of nuclear attack to defend the lives and unalienable rights of the American people, including all the barking moonbats who would oppose me at every turn. The real threat of American military action is the best way to keep our enemies at bay.

* Dismantling socialism. Socialism has dismally failed to solve any problems in the US, and can clearly be argued to have created more problems, that socialists have tried to solve with more socialism. Big government will never be the cure for any social ill, and Americans must face this fact directly and immediately. Per my remarks earlier regarding Federalism, any program not authorized by the Constitution would be targeted for elimination. This is not to say that individual States couldn’t replace these programs as authorized by their own constitutions, but they would not be run or funded by the federal government.

To even accomplish a portion of this would go a long way in re-establshing the constitutional federalist republic our founding fathers set up in their infinite wisdom. That wisdom is still applicable today, and will endure forever in our future, if we allow it.


Maybe Tancredo?? I’ll have to look into it.


Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWRandom Thoughts, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

KABOOM! – Sadr Terrorist Killed

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 6, 2007

The word “terrorist” does not appear in this piece, but one of Sadr’s top asshole fuckwad terrorists has been killed by Iraqi and US forces.

It’s a beautiful day when something like that happens, even if the MSM doesn’t want to call it what it is: a small victory in a huge war.

Ah, well. Par for the course.


H/T to Emperor Misha for the link.

Posted in Conservative Wins, KABOOM!, MSMadness, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Second Blogoversary – Nothing Special Today

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 1, 2007

Maybe later in the day I’ll sit around and reflect on the second year of the RWRepublic, but I’ve got an extended day at work covering for a sick colleague today, so the decision regarding what, if anything, to do will have to come later.

Still, please honor Emperor Misha, the man who passes as my “blogfather” (I really don’t have one, so I honor him since his blog was my inspiration) by checking out this post, an awesome ranting fisk job like no one but the Emperor can do.  I had a great time reading it.


Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, TerrorAsses | 1 Comment »

Fiskin’ Dubya

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 24, 2007

Of course, I’m going to get my two cents in with regard to the President’s State of the Union speech that I slept through (I was very tired and the TV was OFF).

Luckily, a transcript was available here.

Thank you very much. And tonight, I have a high privilege and distinct honor of my own — as the first President to begin the State of the Union message with these words: Madam Speaker.

In his day, the late Congressman Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr. from Baltimore, Maryland, saw Presidents Roosevelt and Truman at this rostrum. But nothing could compare with the sight of his only daughter, Nancy, presiding tonight as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Congratulations, Madam Speaker.

Mrs. Pelosi deserves the words of congratulations offered by the president on this occasion. Disagree with her and hate her beliefs as I do, I would never begrudge her this honor, regardless of the idiocy that gets her into office in election after election.

Two members of the House and Senate are not with us tonight, and we pray for the recovery and speedy return of Senator Tim Johnson and Congressman Charlie Norwood.

Ditto. Speedy recovery to both.

Madam Speaker, Vice President Cheney, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:

The rite of custom brings us together at a defining hour — when decisions are hard and courage is needed. We enter the year 2007 with large endeavors underway, and others that are ours to begin. In all of this, much is asked of us. We must have the will to face difficult challenges and determined enemies — and the wisdom to face them together.

Some in this chamber are new to the House and the Senate — and I congratulate the Democrat majority. Congress has changed, but not our responsibilities. Each of us is guided by our own convictions — and to these we must stay faithful. Yet we’re all held to the same standards, and called to serve the same good purposes: To extend this nation’s prosperity; to spend the people’s money wisely; to solve problems, not leave them to future generations; to guard America against all evil; and to keep faith with those we have sent forth to defend us.

How about cutting back on spending required to have all this hoopla around something that could be done with a simple letter to congress???? Oh, and what happened to people solving THEIR OWN problems?? Isn’t that what America was SUPPOSED to be about???? Isn’t the nation’s prosperity the responsibility of the people themselves and not of their government? I DO NOT call upon the US government to extend prosperity, spend my money, or solve my problems. I merely ask that it guard against evildoers who would violate or rescind my God-given rights and use every avenue available, including the US military, to that end.

We’re not the first to come here with a government divided and uncertainty in the air. Like many before us, we can work through our differences, and achieve big things for the American people. Our citizens don’t much care which side of the aisle we sit on — as long as we’re willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done. Our job is to make life better for our fellow Americans, and to help them to build a future of hope and opportunity — and this is the business before us tonight.

Mr. President, do NOT make the mistake of forgetting what these people did to your father when he sought to work in the “spirit of bipartisanship” you seem to be speaking of.

A future of hope and opportunity begins with a growing economy — and that is what we have. We’re now in the 41st month of uninterrupted job growth, in a recovery that has created 7.2 million new jobs — so far. Unemployment is low, inflation is low, and wages are rising. This economy is on the move, and our job is to keep it that way, not with more government, but with more enterprise.

Then why aren’t there more tax cuts on the table of the sort that has brought about this booming economy??

Next week, I’ll deliver a full report on the state of our economy. Tonight, I want to discuss three economic reforms that deserve to be priorities for this Congress.

First, we must balance the federal budget. We can do so without raising taxes. What we need is impose spending discipline in Washington, D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009, and met that goal three years ahead of schedule. Now let us take the next step. In the coming weeks, I will submit a budget that eliminates the federal deficit within the next five years. I ask you to make the same commitment. Together, we can restrain the spending appetite of the federal government, and we can balance the federal budget.

How about cutting some more taxes, Mr. President? The tax cuts you put into place already have caused huge increases in the amount of money collected in taxes to the federal government. Why not more of them? Wouldn’t the additional money help speed the progress of balancing the budget?

Next, there is the matter of earmarks. These special interest items are often slipped into bills at the last hour — when not even C-SPAN is watching. In 2005 alone, the number of earmarks grew to over 13,000 and totaled nearly $18 billion. Even worse, over 90 percent of earmarks never make it to the floor of the House and Senate — they are dropped into committee reports that are not even part of the bill that arrives on my desk. You didn’t vote them into law. I didn’t sign them into law. Yet, they’re treated as if they have the force of law. The time has come to end this practice. So let us work together to reform the budget process, expose every earmark to the light of day and to a vote in Congress, and cut the number and cost of earmarks at least in half by the end of this session.

Why not simply do away with earmarks?? Wouldn’t that be a better and more cost-effective solution?

And, finally, to keep this economy strong we must take on the challenge of entitlements. Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are commitments of conscience, and so it is our duty to keep them permanently sound. Yet, we’re failing in that duty. And this failure will one day leave our children with three bad options: huge tax increases, huge deficits, or huge and immediate cuts in benefits. Everyone in this chamber knows this to be true — yet somehow we have not found it in ourselves to act. So let us work together and do it now. With enough good sense and goodwill, you and I can fix Medicare and Medicaid — and save Social Security.

Socialist Security and MediScare, et. al are blights on our economy and our nation’s soul that should have never been started in the first place. There is no constitutional excuse for having them. Someone needs to do the right thing and abolish these bastions of socialism that are bringing down our people by convincing them that it is the government’s responsibility to take care of them instead of having them take responsibility for themselves.

Spreading opportunity and hope in America also requires public schools that give children the knowledge and character they need in life. Five years ago, we rose above partisan differences to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, preserving local control, raising standards, and holding those schools accountable for results. And because we acted, students are performing better in reading and math, and minority students are closing the achievement gap.

NCLB sucks. Take it from me – don’t forget what I do every day to pay my bills. The federal government has intruded into states’ rights in a most egregious way with this idiocy. Rescind it and stop acting like it’s the fed’s job to make everything right for everyone. It’s bullshit.

Now the task is to build on the success, without watering down standards, without taking control from local communities, and without backsliding and calling it reform. We can lift student achievement even higher by giving local leaders flexibility to turn around failing schools, and by giving families with children stuck in failing schools the right to choose someplace better. We must increase funds for students who struggle — and make sure these children get the special help they need. And we can make sure our children are prepared for the jobs of the future and our country is more competitive by strengthening math and science skills. The No Child Left Behind Act has worked for America’s children — and I ask Congress to reauthorize this good law.

I ask Congress to rescind this and every other unconstitutional intrusion into the rights of the people and the states. If what you want is to “give local leaders flexibility”, why not simply give them ALL of the power. It’s theirs under the Bill of Rights, you know. Teddy Kennedy can go fuck himself.

A future of hope and opportunity requires that all our citizens have affordable and available health care. When it comes to health care, government has an obligation to care for the elderly, the disabled, and poor children. And we will meet those responsibilities. For all other Americans, private health insurance is the best way to meet their needs. But many Americans cannot afford a health insurance policy.

A future of hope and opportunity requires that all our citizens have affordable and available health care. No it doesn’t. It requires that people live within their means and either plan for the expense of healthcare or work a good deal with their employer for the same. Unfortunately, I fear we’re going to have to deal with the bullshit we’ve already told you morons we don’t want – HITLERYCARE.

And so tonight, I propose two new initiatives to help more Americans afford their own insurance. First, I propose a standard tax deduction for health insurance that will be like the standard tax deduction for dependents. Families with health insurance will pay no income on payroll tax — or payroll taxes on $15,000 of their income. Single Americans with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $7,500 of their income. With this reform, more than 100 million men, women, and children who are now covered by employer-provided insurance will benefit from lower tax bills. At the same time, this reform will level the playing field for those who do not get health insurance through their job. For Americans who now purchase health insurance on their own, this proposal would mean a substantial tax savings — $4,500 for a family of four making $60,000 a year. And for the millions of other Americans who have no health insurance at all, this deduction would help put a basic private health insurance plan within their reach. Changing the tax code is a vital and necessary step to making health care affordable for more Americans.

Why not just cut taxes so that more people could afford to pay for their own health insurance? Why all this complicated Donk-esque bullshit that would wind up being built into an already ridiculous excuse for a tax code? Do we REALLY want more headaches at tax time? You’re acting like a Donk again, Mr. Bush.

My second proposal is to help the states that are coming up with innovative ways to cover the uninsured. States that make basic private health insurance available to all their citizens should receive federal funds to help them provide this coverage to the poor and the sick. I have asked the Secretary of Health and Human Services to work with Congress to take existing federal funds and use them to create “Affordable Choices” grants. These grants would give our nation’s governors more money and more flexibility to get private health insurance to those most in need.

Or you could just cut taxes and simplify the tax code…

There are many other ways that Congress can help. We need to expand Health Savings Accounts. We need to help small businesses through Association Health Plans. We need to reduce costs and medical errors with better information technology. We will encourage price transparency. And to protect good doctors from junk lawsuits, we’re passing medical liability reform. In all we do, we must remember that the best health care decisions are made not by government and insurance companies, but by patients and their doctors.

Actually what you really need to do is just get the government out of the business of making decisions that people can and should make for themselves. Oh sorry. That would be too Reagan-like. Can’t have that now, can we?

Extending hope and opportunity in our country requires an immigration system worthy of America — with laws that are fair and borders that are secure. When laws and borders are routinely violated, this harms the interests of our country. To secure our border, we’re doubling the size of the Border Patrol, and funding new infrastructure and technology.

This will do no good if the new Border Patrol agents aren’t allowed to do their job.

Yet even with all these steps, we cannot fully secure the border unless we take pressure off the border — and that requires a temporary worker program. We should establish a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis. As a result, they won’t have to try to sneak in, and that will leave Border Agents free to chase down drug smugglers and criminals and terrorists. We’ll enforce our immigration laws at the work site and give employers the tools to verify the legal status of their workers, so there’s no excuse left for violating the law.

Secure the borders first, then go with this if you want. But SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST ALREADY!

We need to uphold the great tradition of the melting pot that welcomes and assimilates new arrivals. We need to resolve the status of the illegal immigrants who are already in our country without animosity and without amnesty. Convictions run deep in this Capitol when it comes to immigration. Let us have a serious, civil, and conclusive debate, so that you can pass, and I can sign, comprehensive immigration reform into law.

Resolve their status by sending them home and requiring them to follow the law in coming back. Without doing this, you are showing yourself to be a total and complete pussy when it comes to immigration. What’s worse is that the terrorasses see this and use it to their advantage. Is that what you really want, Mr. Bush?

Extending hope and opportunity depends on a stable supply of energy that keeps America’s economy running and America’s environment clean. For too long our nation has been dependent on foreign oil. And this dependence leaves us more vulnerable to hostile regimes, and to terrorists — who could cause huge disruptions of oil shipments, and raise the price of oil, and do great harm to our economy.

Yep, and it’s about time we tapped the huge sources of oil we have here in the United States. In fact, it’s absolutely IMPERATIVE.

It’s in our vital interest to diversify America’s energy supply — the way forward is through technology. We must continue changing the way America generates electric power, by even greater use of clean coal technology, solar and wind energy, and clean, safe nuclear power. We need to press on with battery research for plug-in and hybrid vehicles, and expand the use of clean diesel vehicles and biodiesel fuel. We must continue investing in new methods of producing ethanol — using everything from wood chips to grasses, to agricultural wastes.

All totally useless unless we get at the oil we have in Alaska, Colorado, and all around this great country.

We made a lot of progress, thanks to good policies here in Washington and the strong response of the market. And now even more dramatic advances are within reach. Tonight, I ask Congress to join me in pursuing a great goal. Let us build on the work we’ve done and reduce gasoline usage in the United States by 20 percent in the next 10 years. When we do that we will have cut our total imports by the equivalent of three-quarters of all the oil we now import from the Middle East.

Let’s not. There’s no authorization for it in the Constitution. Why can’t you just inspire ordinary Americans to do it, Mr. President? Why must the federal government always be the answer? Oh yeah. I forgot. No one wants to answer that one.

To reach this goal, we must increase the supply of alternative fuels, by setting a mandatory fuels standard to require 35 billion gallons of renewable and alternative fuels in 2017 — and that is nearly five times the current target. At the same time, we need to reform and modernize fuel economy standards for cars the way we did for light trucks — and conserve up to 8.5 billion more gallons of gasoline by 2017.

To reach this goal, we must get the fed out of the business of telling people what to do with their time and money. Tell us Americans what you want and then shut the fuck up. If it’s worth doing, it will be done. If not, then you did what you could.

Achieving these ambitious goals will dramatically reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but it’s not going to eliminate it. And so as we continue to diversify our fuel supply, we must step up domestic oil production in environmentally sensitive ways. And to further protect America against severe disruptions to our oil supply, I ask Congress to double the current capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

This is fine, since the SPR is actually mainly for military purposes… And you can bet Americans will do whatever they can to see to it that domestic oil production gets stepped up – IF the fed will let them, of course.

America is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that will enable us to live our lives less dependent on oil. And these technologies will help us be better stewards of the environment, and they will help us to confront the serious challenge of global climate change.

Global climate change… Didn’t Al Gore lose the election in 2000 (or at least have it “stolen”from him)? Why does it seem to me that Dubya is becoming DONKya?

A future of hope and opportunity requires a fair, impartial system of justice. The lives of our citizens across our nation are affected by the outcome of cases pending in our federal courts. We have a shared obligation to ensure that the federal courts have enough judges to hear those cases and deliver timely rulings. As President, I have a duty to nominate qualified men and women to vacancies on the federal bench. And the United States Senate has a duty, as well, to give those nominees a fair hearing, and a prompt up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.

While appointing good Constitutionalists to the Supreme Court and other courts has been a positive aspect of your presidency, Mr. Bush, we also have an obligation to keep these and others charged with making, enforcing, and ruling on laws honest. Vague laws that leave too much room for “interpretation” should never be written, passed, enforced, or ruled constitutional. Police officers arresting individuals without even knowing what charges will be filed should be considered a major violation of people’s rights. These kinds of practices have led directly to serious violations of personal property rights such as Kelo, and must be addressed. I’m not holding my breath.

For all of us in this room, there is no higher responsibility than to protect the people of this country from danger. Five years have come and gone since we saw the scenes and felt the sorrow that the terrorists can cause. We’ve had time to take stock of our situation. We’ve added many critical protections to guard the homeland. We know with certainty that the horrors of that September morning were just a glimpse of what the terrorists intend for us — unless we stop them.

With the distance of time, we find ourselves debating the causes of conflict and the course we have followed. Such debates are essential when a great democracy faces great questions. Yet one question has surely been settled: that to win the war on terror we must take the fight to the enemy.

To win we much take the fight to the enemy. Then why haven’t we? Our adversary is right there in Iraq within easy shooting range of our soldiers. Why do we handcuff them and give them rules of engagement that stop them from doing that very thing? Why do we send them over there if not to fight and kill terrorists? I’m all for the war and winning it, Mr. President. You have made some really great decisions with regard to the war, but what good will all of those decisions be if we lose a war that could have easily been won by simply letting our soldiers fight?

From the start, America and our allies have protected our people by staying on the offense. The enemy knows that the days of comfortable sanctuary, easy movement, steady financing, and free flowing communications are long over. For the terrorists, life since 9/11 has never been the same.

I’m not sure I would call what is going on in Iraq “offense”.

Our success in this war is often measured by the things that did not happen. We cannot know the full extent of the attacks that we and our allies have prevented, but here is some of what we do know: We stopped an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked airplane into the tallest building on the West Coast. We broke up a Southeast Asian terror cell grooming operatives for attacks inside the United States. We uncovered an al Qaeda cell developing anthrax to be used in attacks against America. And just last August, British authorities uncovered a plot to blow up passenger planes bound for America over the Atlantic Ocean. For each life saved, we owe a debt of gratitude to the brave public servants who devote their lives to finding the terrorists and stopping them.

Nice job. NOW can we start shooting?

Every success against the terrorists is a reminder of the shoreless ambitions of this enemy. The evil that inspired and rejoiced in 9/11 is still at work in the world. And so long as that’s the case, America is still a nation at war.

In the mind of the terrorist, this war began well before September the 11th, and will not end until their radical vision is fulfilled. And these past five years have given us a much clearer view of the nature of this enemy. Al Qaeda and its followers are Sunni extremists, possessed by hatred and commanded by a harsh and narrow ideology. Take almost any principle of civilization, and their goal is the opposite. They preach with threats, instruct with bullets and bombs, and promise paradise for the murder of the innocent.

So true. NOW can we start shooting?

Our enemies are quite explicit about their intentions. They want to overthrow moderate governments, and establish safe havens from which to plan and carry out new attacks on our country. By killing and terrorizing Americans, they want to force our country to retreat from the world and abandon the cause of liberty. They would then be free to impose their will and spread their totalitarian ideology. Listen to this warning from the late terrorist Zarqawi: “We will sacrifice our blood and bodies to put an end to your dreams, and what is coming is even worse.” Osama bin Laden declared: “Death is better than living on this Earth with the unbelievers among us.”

These men are not given to idle words, and they are just one camp in the Islamist radical movement. In recent times, it has also become clear that we face an escalating danger from Shia extremists who are just as hostile to America, and are also determined to dominate the Middle East. Many are known to take direction from the regime in Iran, which is funding and arming terrorists like Hezbollah — a group second only to al Qaeda in the American lives it has taken.

Amen to all of that. NOW can we start shooting?

The Shia and Sunni extremists are different faces of the same totalitarian threat. Whatever slogans they chant, when they slaughter the innocent they have the same wicked purposes. They want to kill Americans, kill democracy in the Middle East, and gain the weapons to kill on an even more horrific scale.

In the sixth year since our nation was attacked, I wish I could report to you that the dangers had ended. They have not. And so it remains the policy of this government to use every lawful and proper tool of intelligence, diplomacy, law enforcement, and military action to do our duty, to find these enemies, and to protect the American people.

Sir. We have the most powerful military in the history of the world. We’d like to start shooting. What say?

This war is more than a clash of arms — it is a decisive ideological struggle, and the security of our nation is in the balance. To prevail, we must remove the conditions that inspire blind hatred, and drove 19 men to get onto airplanes and to come and kill us. What every terrorist fears most is human freedom — societies where men and women make their own choices, answer to their own conscience, and live by their hopes instead of their resentments. Free people are not drawn to violent and malignant ideologies — and most will choose a better way when they’re given a chance. So we advance our own security interests by helping moderates and reformers and brave voices for democracy. The great question of our day is whether America will help men and women in the Middle East to build free societies and share in the rights of all humanity. And I say, for the sake of our own security, we must.

The best way to do this is to let our soldiers start shooting.

In the last two years, we’ve seen the desire for liberty in the broader Middle East — and we have been sobered by the enemy’s fierce reaction. In 2005, the world watched as the citizens of Lebanon raised the banner of the Cedar Revolution, they drove out the Syrian occupiers and chose new leaders in free elections. In 2005, the people of Afghanistan defied the terrorists and elected a democratic legislature. And in 2005, the Iraqi people held three national elections, choosing a transitional government, adopting the most progressive, democratic constitution in the Arab world, and then electing a government under that constitution. Despite endless threats from the killers in their midst, nearly 12 million Iraqi citizens came out to vote in a show of hope and solidarity that we should never forget.

A thinking enemy watched all of these scenes, adjusted their tactics, and in 2006 they struck back. In Lebanon, assassins took the life of Pierre Gemayel, a prominent participant in the Cedar Revolution. Hezbollah terrorists, with support from Syria and Iran, sowed conflict in the region and are seeking to undermine Lebanon’s legitimately elected government. In Afghanistan, Taliban and al Qaeda fighters tried to regain power by regrouping and engaging Afghan and NATO forces. In Iraq, al Qaeda and other Sunni extremists blew up one of the most sacred places in Shia Islam — the Golden Mosque of Samarra. This atrocity, directed at a Muslim house of prayer, was designed to provoke retaliation from Iraqi Shia — and it succeeded. Radical Shia elements, some of whom receive support from Iran, formed death squads. The result was a tragic escalation of sectarian rage and reprisal that continues to this day.

It’s time to start shooting these terrorists.

This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we’re in. Every one of us wishes this war were over and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises unkept, our friends abandoned, and our own security at risk. Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour, it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. Let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory.

I don’t see this happening unless we start shooting.

We’re carrying out a new strategy in Iraq — a plan that demands more from Iraq’s elected government, and gives our forces in Iraq the reinforcements they need to complete their mission. Our goal is a democratic Iraq that upholds the rule of law, respects the rights of its people, provides them security, and is an ally in the war on terror.

Start shooting. Until you do, not much else has a chance.

In order to make progress toward this goal, the Iraqi government must stop the sectarian violence in its capital. But the Iraqis are not yet ready to do this on their own. So we’re deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq. The vast majority will go to Baghdad, where they will help Iraqi forces to clear and secure neighborhoods, and serve as advisers embedded in Iraqi Army units. With Iraqis in the lead, our forces will help secure the city by chasing down the terrorists, insurgents, and the roaming death squads. And in Anbar Province, where al Qaeda terrorists have gathered and local forces have begun showing a willingness to fight them, we’re sending an additional 4,000 United States Marines, with orders to find the terrorists and clear them out. We didn’t drive al Qaeda out of their safe haven in Afghanistan only to let them set up a new safe haven in a free Iraq.

Does this mean that the Iraqis can start shooting? Someone had better do it. The terrorists aren’t going to stop shooting until they’re shot and dead.

The people of Iraq want to live in peace, and now it’s time for their government to act. Iraq’s leaders know that our commitment is not open-ended. They have promised to deploy more of their own troops to secure Baghdad — and they must do so. They pledged that they will confront violent radicals of any faction or political party — and they need to follow through, and lift needless restrictions on Iraqi and coalition forces, so these troops can achieve their mission of bringing security to all of the people of Baghdad. Iraq’s leaders have committed themselves to a series of benchmarks — to achieve reconciliation, to share oil revenues among all of Iraq’s citizens, to put the wealth of Iraq into the rebuilding of Iraq, to allow more Iraqis to re-enter their nation’s civic life, to hold local elections, and to take responsibility for security in every Iraqi province. But for all of this to happen, Baghdad must be secure. And our plan will help the Iraqi government take back its capital and make good on its commitments.

The terrorists have been shooting at our soldiers and Iraqi allies. Until we shoot back, Baghdad will never be properly secure.

My fellow citizens, our military commanders and I have carefully weighed the options. We discussed every possible approach. In the end, I chose this course of action because it provides the best chance for success. Many in this chamber understand that America must not fail in Iraq, because you understand that the consequences of failure would be grievous and far-reaching.

America must not fail in Iraq. You got that right. Why can’t we just accept the fact that to win the war we’re going to have to let our soldiers shoot and kill the terrorists instead of waiting for them to shoot our soldiers?

If American forces step back before Baghdad is secure, the Iraqi government would be overrun by extremists on all sides. We could expect an epic battle between Shia extremists backed by Iran, and Sunni extremists aided by al Qaeda and supporters of the old regime. A contagion of violence could spill out across the country — and in time, the entire region could be drawn into the conflict.

Start shooting right now and watch Baghdad be secure in record time. Look how fast we took the place when we were allowed to shoot…

For America, this is a nightmare scenario. For the enemy, this is the objective. Chaos is the greatest ally — their greatest ally in this struggle. And out of chaos in Iraq would emerge an emboldened enemy with new safe havens, new recruits, new resources, and an even greater determination to harm America. To allow this to happen would be to ignore the lessons of September the 11th and invite tragedy. Ladies and gentlemen, nothing is more important at this moment in our history than for America to succeed in the Middle East, to succeed in Iraq and to spare the American people from this danger.

This is where matters stand tonight, in the here and now. I have spoken with many of you in person. I respect you and the arguments you’ve made. We went into this largely united, in our assumptions and in our convictions. And whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure. Our country is pursuing a new strategy in Iraq, and I ask you to give it a chance to work. And I ask you to support our troops in the field, and those on their way.

The war on terror we fight today is a generational struggle that will continue long after you and I have turned our duties over to others. And that’s why it’s important to work together so our nation can see this great effort through. Both parties and both branches should work in close consultation. It’s why I propose to establish a special advisory council on the war on terror, made up of leaders in Congress from both political parties. We will share ideas for how to position America to meet every challenge that confronts us. We’ll show our enemies abroad that we are united in the goal of victory.

And one of the first steps we can take together is to add to the ranks of our military so that the American Armed Forces are ready for all the challenges ahead. Tonight I ask the Congress to authorize an increase in the size of our active Army and Marine Corps by 92,000 in the next five years. A second task we can take on together is to design and establish a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps. Such a corps would function much like our military reserve. It would ease the burden on the Armed Forces by allowing us to hire civilians with critical skills to serve on missions abroad when America needs them. It would give people across America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve in the defining struggle of our time.

None of this will have any effect on the terrorists unless these and our existing soldiers are allowed to shoot at the terrorists.

Americans can have confidence in the outcome of this struggle because we’re not in this struggle alone. We have a diplomatic strategy that is rallying the world to join in the fight against extremism. In Iraq, multinational forces are operating under a mandate from the United Nations. We’re working with Jordan and Saudi Arabia and Egypt and the Gulf States to increase support for Iraq’s government.

The United Nations has imposed sanctions on Iran, and made it clear that the world will not allow the regime in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons. With the other members of the Quartet — the U.N., the European Union, and Russia — we’re pursuing diplomacy to help bring peace to the Holy Land, and pursuing the establishment of a democratic Palestinian state living side-by-side with Israel in peace and security. In Afghanistan, NATO has taken the lead in turning back the Taliban and al Qaeda offensive — the first time the Alliance has deployed forces outside the North Atlantic area. Together with our partners in China, Japan, Russia, and South Korea, we’re pursuing intensive diplomacy to achieve a Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

Pursuing peace with the help of our enemies (UN, EU, Russia)? Sounds kind of sick to me.

We will continue to speak out for the cause of freedom in places like Cuba, Belarus, and Burma — and continue to awaken the conscience of the world to save the people of Darfur.

Amen. Mr. President.

American foreign policy is more than a matter of war and diplomacy. Our work in the world is also based on a timeless truth: To whom much is given, much is required. We hear the call to take on the challenges of hunger and poverty and disease — and that is precisely what America is doing. We must continue to fight HIV/AIDS, especially on the continent of Africa. Because you funded our Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the number of people receiving life-saving drugs has grown from 50,000 to more than 800,000 in three short years. I ask you to continue funding our efforts to fight HIV/AIDS. I ask you to provide $1.2 billion over five years so we can combat malaria in 15 African countries.

Bullshit. We may have these responsibilities as individual citizens, but our government has NO right getting involved in ANY of it.

I ask that you fund the Millennium Challenge Account, so that American aid reaches the people who need it, in nations where democracy is on the rise and corruption is in retreat. And let us continue to support the expanded trade and debt relief that are the best hope for lifting lives and eliminating poverty.

I ask that the government do nothing of the sort, and instead plead with the American people to support whatever the cause du jour is. Let the chips fall where they may. This way people aren’t being forced to spend their money in ways that they wouldn’t want to or worse, having it taken from them and spent in ways they wouldn’t want to spend it.

When America serves others in this way, we show the strength and generosity of our country. These deeds reflect the character of our people. The greatest strength we have is the heroic kindness, courage, and self-sacrifice of the American people. You see this spirit often if you know where to look — and tonight we need only look above to the gallery.

The deeds I mentioned reflect the character of our people. The deeds you mention, Mr. President, only reflect the evil tendency of our government to take people’s money and spend it without true regard for those same people’s intentions.

Dikembe Mutombo grew up in Africa, amid great poverty and disease. He came to Georgetown University on a scholarship to study medicine — but Coach John Thompson got a look at Dikembe and had a different idea. Dikembe became a star in the NBA, and a citizen of the United States. But he never forgot the land of his birth, or the duty to share his blessings with others. He built a brand new hospital in his old hometown. A friend has said of this good-hearted man: “Mutombo believes that God has given him this opportunity to do great things.” And we are proud to call this son of the Congo a citizen of the United States of America.

I’ve held this man’s shoe. I promise I really have. It extends from my elbow to my fingertips. Motherfucker has HUGE FEET!

He also seems to have a huge heart, and the means to use it to help others. Why are you using this awesome example of a well-to-do American using HIS OWN money, not stealing it from others like you do every day, to create a better life for others? It’s NOT the same thing.

After her daughter was born, Julie Aigner-Clark searched for ways to share her love of music and art with her child. So she borrowed some equipment, and began filming children’s videos in her basement. The Baby Einstein Company was born, and in just five years her business grew to more than $20 million in sales. In November 2001, Julie sold Baby Einstein to the Walt Disney Company, and with her help Baby Einstein has grown into a $200 million business. Julie represents the great enterprising spirit of America. And she is using her success to help others — producing child safety videos with John Walsh of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Julie says of her new project: “I believe it’s the most important thing that I have ever done. I believe that children have the right to live in a world that is safe.” And so tonight, we are pleased to welcome this talented business entrepreneur and generous social entrepreneur — Julie Aigner-Clark.

Again, not a cent begged for from others or from the government. It’s NOT the same thing.

Three weeks ago, Wesley Autrey was waiting at a Harlem subway station with his two little girls, when he saw a man fall into the path of a train. With seconds to act, Wesley jumped onto the tracks, pulled the man into the space between the rails, and held him as the train passed right above their heads. He insists he’s not a hero. He says: “We got guys and girls overseas dying for us to have our freedoms. We have got to show each other some love.” There is something wonderful about a country that produces a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey.

And not once did Wesley Autrey ask the government to help him save that life.

Tommy Rieman was a teenager pumping gas in Independence, Kentucky, when he enlisted in the United States Army. In December 2003, he was on a reconnaissance mission in Iraq when his team came under heavy enemy fire. From his Humvee, Sergeant Rieman returned fire; he used his body as a shield to protect his gunner. He was shot in the chest and arm, and received shrapnel wounds to his legs — yet he refused medical attention, and stayed in the fight. He helped to repel a second attack, firing grenades at the enemy’s position. For his exceptional courage, Sergeant Rieman was awarded the Silver Star. And like so many other Americans who have volunteered to defend us, he has earned the respect and the gratitude of our entire country.

Volunteering to put your life on the line for others is the greatest gift a person can give. This does not illustrate at all the concept of using the government, a necessary evil at best, as a means of solving people’s problems. It’s bullshit.

In such courage and compassion, ladies and gentlemen, we see the spirit and character of America — and these qualities are not in short supply. This is a decent and honorable country — and resilient, too. We’ve been through a lot together. We’ve met challenges and faced dangers, and we know that more lie ahead. Yet we can go forward with confidence — because the State of our Union is strong, our cause in the world is right, and tonight that cause goes on. God bless.

See you next year. Thank you for your prayers.

The courage and compassion of the American people, including Dikembe Mutombo, Julie Aigner-Clark, Wesley Autrey, and Tommy Rieman, does reflect the spirit and character of this, the greatest nation God ever gave this world, but ALL of these people are showing courage and character that is the ANTITHESIS of the evil socialist tendencies of those in our government.

I support this president, and have since his first term began. I am, however, disappointed in his failure to learn the lessons of his father’s failures, such as failing to finish the job in Iraq and playing stupid games like “Let’s Get Along”, which ruined the legacy of his presidency. If Dubya is going to be successful, he absolutely MUST make this change, or his legacy is doomed.

Fuck the Democrats and kill the terrorists, and W can change this in a heartbeat.


Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWRants, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Fiskin’ Dubya

Troop Surge …

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 11, 2007

Seems to me a lot of the people speaking out against increased troop deployments are a lot of the same people who have been saying that’s what we have needed …

What is up with that?


Posted in Liberal Bullshit, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Troop Surge …

Dead as a Fucking Doornail

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 29, 2006

It’s official. Saddam Hussein has met his maker. I was busy writing arrangements at the happy moment. I got the word about ten minutes ago, about a half hour after the fuckhole’s neck snapped at the end of the rope. I can’t wait to watch the video and see him twitch.

h/t to Wild Thing for the cat.

Justice has been served.

Now may he rest in as much peace as he deserves.


Posted in KABOOM!, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Dead as a Fucking Doornail

Scha-WING!! So-damn Insane to be Executed

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 27, 2006

Saddam will hang within 30 days.

I hope the fucker twitches in agony for a while before he checks out.


Posted in Conservative Wins, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Scha-WING!! So-damn Insane to be Executed

Hawk’s Advice to the President

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 20, 2006

In his Human Events column today, John Hawkins offers the President some advice:

The first rule of politics is to take care of your base first and then reach out to the middle. Unfortunately, Mr. President, you’ve egregiously broken that rule and allowed an antagonistic relationship to develop between your administration and a significant part of your base. Simply by repairing that rift, you can get your approval rating back up into the mid-forties and perhaps just as importantly, you can staunch the biting criticism from the right that has done so much damage to your presidency. There are a number of ways you can shore up your right flank.

OK. Fair enough. Let’s see what you have in mind.

A) Announce that you support splitting the security measures and amnesty parts of the senate bill into two parts. Then say you want to support security, the wall, and tough enforcement measures now and that you want to deal with the guest worker program and other “comprehensive” features that many members of your base find so odious later. By doing this, you can take the venom out of the illegal immigration argument by not holding secure borders hostage to an amnesty program, and yet you can still say that you support the other features that some Hispanic activists, liberals, and big business want.

This is an idea I have long supported, but haven’t heard put this way. Build the goddamned wall and get some security around here and THEN start talking about guest workers and whatnot. Good call, John.

B) Let it be known that you think that one of the messages that the American public was sending in 2006 was that they were tired of runaway spending and as a consequence, make a point of vetoing every bill the Democrats send your way that’s full of earmarks or new big government programs. Sure, this has never been one of your strong points, but the Democrats are bigger spenders than you’ve ever been and by keeping them in check, you can earn credit with the base and the American people.

The problem with this is that the President probably DOESN’T think the American public was sending that message at all. I doubt it myself. After all, if the problem is with runaway spending, who REALLY thinks they’d be better off with a Democrat?

C) The new media can help you reconnect with your base. Sit down with Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, and Fox News for interviews. They’ll be flattered that you got together with them and are likely to be particularly friendly. Moreover, you’ll be telling conservatives that, “Yes, I am still one of you and want to reach out to you,” just by showing up and making the effort.

This may get GW some brownie points, but without doing A and B, it’s likely to be futile.

2. Many of the American people feel like we’re treading water in Iraq. So, they’re lukewarm on continuing to risk the lives of our soldiers in an effort that they believe is just delaying the inevitable. In particular, there’s a distinct sense among conservatives that we’re fighting with one hand tied behind our back, that our soldiers are being strait-jacketed by ridiculous rules of engagement, and that we’re allowing Islamo-fascist thugs in Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia along with Sadr’s militia to take potshots at our troops with impunity. Moreover, Americans are looking at North Korea’s nuclear weapons, Iran building nuclear weapons, Hezbollah engineering a takeover of Lebanon, and the response of the United States has been….what exactly?

Zip. Zero. Nada. And don’t expect it to change for the better when the Donks get started next month. I think even Sage would back you here, John. If we’re going to fight a war, let our soldiers fight the goddamned war and be done with it. All this pussying around does is make us look like, well, a bunch of pussies.

n 2004, Americans thought they were voting for the guy who stood on top of a pile of rubble at the World Trade Center with a bullhorn and said, “I can hear you! The rest of the world hears you. And the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!” What happened to that guy? What happened to the guy who said, “Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.” What happened to the guy whom the Europeans kept calling a “cowboy?” Where has that guy been since the election in 2004? The American people need to be shown that you’re still engaged, that you’re still determined to “bring our enemies to justice or bring justice to our enemies,” and that you’re still hellbent on doing whatever it takes to win the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism.

With the Donks taking over the House and Senate, this isn’t likely. Even if the President decides to get tough again, the Congress will stand in his way, if only to be able to hang him politically for “starting another Vietnam”.

The GOP has gotten in trouble on the domestic front for being “democrat light” on issues like spending, illegal immigration, and big government programs. So, when the Democrats take over, don’t hesitate to use your veto power and the soapbox that the presidency gives you when they veer off to the left. Draw some real distinctions between what we Republicans believe and what the Democrats believe.

Draw some distinctions. If you spend like a Donk, you might as well be a Donk. If you’re weak on security and play the role of socialst like a Donk, then again, you might as well be a Donk. The problem is that President Bush is too busy trying to get along (like his father before him) to stand up to the Donks and be a conservative. Well, that and he’s not conservative to begin with.

Also, please, please, Mr. President, start defending yourself. When prominent Democrats accuse you of lying to America, torturing prisoners, or screwing the middle-class, tear a chunk out of them every once in a while instead of letting them get away with slapping you around. Americans tend not to like extreme attacks on their President, but if they hear them day in and day out and you never respond, they start to get the idea that maybe you’re staying quiet because what they’re saying is true. Don’t let that continue to happen, Mr. President.

This has been a major problem in President Bush’s presidency from the getgo. The Donks attack, and he just bends over and takes it. He’d be in a lot better shape and may even be looking at a friendly Congress if he had done differently. The Donks stand up and defend themselves even if they have to lie to do it. Why can’t “our guy”?

I think Hawk is largely right on this one.


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Hawk’s Advice to the President

Coulter on Surrender

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 14, 2006

Ann Coulter has posted a gem today. It’s perfectly summarized at the end.

If absolutely nothing changed in Iraq over the next few years — if it didn’t continue to get better and if the savages never lost heart (I’m assuming they subscribe to “TimesSelect”) — by 2010, 6,000 brave American troops will have died to prevent another 9/11 terrorist attack on American soil for a decade.

If that’s a war Americans think we’re “losing,” Osama bin Laden was right: We are a paper tiger.

Go read the whole thing.


Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, KABOOM!, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Coulter on Surrender

Peaceful Muslims

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 13, 2006

Please support FreeMuslims.org. This organization is the antithesis of CAIR, and should be placed in high esteem for their willingness to take a stance against CAIR and their terrorist friends.

Thanks for taking a stand, guys!


Posted in Confronting Libs, TerrorAsses | Comments Off on Peaceful Muslims