Never mind the pajamas … We blog in the nude!

Archive for the ‘Decision 2008’ Category

The Republican Nominee: Johnny McScrewUs

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 10, 2008

OK, so now it’s time to take a look at the Republican contenders. I won’t worry about Mitt, because he’s all but out of it now, but I’ll definitely consider a look at Huckabee if the idea seems fairly worthwhile at the time. For now here’s my constitutional analysis of John McCain (and that’s probably the last time you’ll see me use his real name around here – as undeserved as it is in the first place).

For starters, I’ve exercised the utmost fairness here by only evaluating the platform expressed on Mr. McBullshit’s campaign website. Given that he’s trying to appeal to conservatives (too late idiot, we aren’t half asleep like the rest of America), he made sure that the things that WE stand for were emphasized, so it’s important to take these results (like those of Barack and Hitlery) with a grain of salt. Hitlery was working to conceal her extreme socialist agenda, and Obama was working to inundate you with so much you wouldn’t have a legitimate opportunity to make sense of it all – both in the hope that you would vote for them based on some ridiculous concept of “change”. What they seem to be advocating is change for change’s sake rather than encouraging you to look closely at the changes they advocate and THEN decide for whom to vote. Seriously, a change that involves expanding the illegal socialist agenda that’s been the order of the day for the last three quarters of a century is clearly not the kind of change that America needs, and I would hope it’s not the kind of change she would want.

That being said, I took a look at the agenda that Johnny McFeingold was selling on his website. some of this stuff was a bunch of outright lies. There’s plenty of bullshit on McDumbass’s site, and I imagine much of it will be confronted during the campaign. It’s sad to note that this scumbag seems to be the last hope America has of avoiding a Hitlery presidency (unless the Schlock can somehow pull off a win – in which case Hitlery will be back to try again, mark my words).

Of course, the benefit of four years of ANY Democrat (including J. McC.) should not be overlooked. Four years of Jimmy Carter gave us eight years of Ronald Reagan, and an economic boom that even eight years of Bill Clinton couldn’t stop. This is a great reason to support the current write-in campaign for Fred Thompson. Conservatives have nothing to lose. We either win the campaign and get Thompson elected, or we make a strong statement that can’t be ignored in 2012. A strong showing for Fred takes away the liberal mandate each of the four liberals still in the race would otherwise have.

Back to The asshole. While McDorkus made a pretty good showing here in this review, some of the things he’s wrong on are just too wrong to just sit back and accept (Scamnesty and his sponsoring of a bill that, for all intents and purposes, repealed the First Amendment). Some things, as I will point out, are inappropriately inconsistent. Still, McWhatTheHellAmIDoingHere was able to get a grade of 77% constitutional based upon those things that he openly advocates in his platform.

Before you go and get excited about this and go and vote for the guy, let me remind you of a couple of tidbits: McCain-Kennedy and McCain-Feingold.

Both of these are absolute slaps in the face of the conservative movement. You’d think a Senator from a border state, particularly one with Mexico’s reputation, would have some clue when it came to illegal aliens and their shenanigans, but does he?? Nope. Not at all. Does a conservative with presidential aspirations sponsor a bill that, for all intents and purposes, repeals the First Amendment? Wait till you see what else came up in this research.

First, let’s address the blatant lies that this idiot posts on his site. Check out this quote from the section entitled “Strict Constructionist Philosophy” (as if someone repealing important tenets of the Bill of Rights could even assert himself as a “strict constructionist”):

We are a free people. This means that the rules we have agreed to live by are those made by the people themselves, not a small elite that claims to be wiser than everybody else.

If Johnny-wad believed this, he wouldn’t, on the same website, be touting his “achievements” with regard to campaign finance reform, in which he basically tells us that these same free people don’t have the right to put our money into political campaigns as we see fit, or say what we want about candidates whenever the fuck we damned well please, as the First Amendment is supposed to guarantee. This is a blatant lie, and I’m not falling for it. You shouldn’t either.

Also, some inconsistencies should be addressed. In a section entitled “Second Amendment Rights”, we first are handed this line, as if this candidate really belived it (which he may or may not, but hear me out):

John McCain believes that banning ammunition is just another way to undermine Second Amendment rights.

OK. So I’m supposed to believe that Jizz McJerkoff believes that banning ammunition is “just another way to undermine Second Amendment rights”, when in the next breath I get THIS line of bullshit?

John McCain supports instant criminal background checks to help prohibit criminals from buying firearms …

Last time I checked, those who owed a debt to society were either in prison or under probationary contract not to carry. People who have taken this position have more often than not extended their position to include those who have completed their sentence and have returned to their homes and families. Defining these people as “criminals” and denying them the right to own, carry, and use firearms is an extremely heinous violation of their Second Amendment rights. It is clearly fair to say that anyone considered safe to be out in public unsupervised should not be denied this right. After all, who will defend them against the criminals wearing badges; or worse, the criminals in state capitals and in Washington (including John McCain himself) who commit the very types of crimes I have brought to the fore in this post?

So take it with a grain of salt, but these are the results. That grain of salt is a necessary thing these days, especially with regard to these liberals. Hitlery left a lot of very important shit out. Barack repeated himself to the point of total confusion. McAbel’sMurderer hides illegal positions within legal ones and has a record of repealing rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Next we’ll see what the Huckster would do to America.


Related: Hitlery Clinton: 68% unconstitutional – 2/8/2008
Barack Obama – 84% Unconstitutional – 2/7/2008


Posted in Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Playing it Smart: Hitlery

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 8, 2008

As promised, here’s the research on Hitlery’s proposals as outlined on her web site. A few notes about this research, as this site was much easier to navigate and was much better in its presentation than that of Barack Hussein bin Obama. The numbers were very surprising, though this could be blamed either on the redundancy of Obama’s presentation OR the simple fact that Hitlery is very smart in the way she presents things so as to make it seem good for America when the reverse is true.

I grabbed a quote or two that I found interesting. These two quotes were presented in the context of ripping President Bush for his understandable opposition to embryonic stem cell research, but it doesn’t take a very close look to see the disingenuousness in the statement. Simply apply them to her position on AIDS or, more obviously, man-made global warming, and you get the picture.

[Clinton will] ban political appointees from unduly interfering with scientific conclusions and publications.

This will be true ONLY as long as those “scientific conclusions and publications” are in sync with whatever she believes (or better, believes will increase her power).

It is important to … ensure that the President receives objective, fact-based advice.

OK. I’m going to cut in early here. The quote continues below. Again, what if the President gets objective, fact-based advice (Lord knows there’s already plenty of it out there) that suggests that there is nothing to worry about with regard to “global warming”, and that it’s not necessary to do anything to try to stop something that’s either not happening at all or, at least, is not being influenced by human activity? Do you really believe she’s going to accept that as “objective, fact-based advice”? I can answer that with two words: FAT FUCKING CHANCE (OK … three words. Who’s counting anyway?)

Hillary Clinton will reverse the Bush Administration’s irresponsible politicization of science.

and we are to believe this because? We’ve had eight years of a Republican president who has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to reverse prior administrations’ blatant, irresponsible, and frankly disgusting politicization of science vis-a-vis AIDS and “the environment”. Are we really to believe that Hitlery, who could have influenced her ex-President husband to do just that (and didn’t) is going to change this? BULLSHIT.

And this research, unfortunately, only reviews the constitutionality (read that LEGALITY) of those things shown on her website. Her prior assaults on the First and Second Amendments and how she would continue them are curiously omitted. So, how does her platform stack up against the Constitution of the United States of America? It comes in at 68% unconstitutional. More than two thirds of the things she admits to advocating are blatantly illegal under the limitations placed upon her as president, and frankly, as Senator – the office she currently holds.

Is she more dangerous that Barack the Schlock? Not likely. Her convenient omissions would definitely play well with the socialists in Congress, particularly Pelosi and her minions. None of them give a rat’s ass after a cheese shit what the Constitution says their limitations are. Barack at least tells you what he’s about on his website, even if he never mentions it in public. There could be omissions there, but who would expect that from a guy who keeps saying the same things over and over and over? Besides, we have had eight years of a president whom we elected for that very reason, and the only real benefits were healthy tax cuts and a strong stand on terrorism. No Child Left Behind? Please.

Just more proof that no liberal is fit for office in the US government. Next up: Johnny McShitPie


Barack Obama – 84% Unconstitutional – 2/7/2008

Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

A Little Research: Obama

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 7, 2008

This will be much more important when I do it for the Republicans, i know, because that will show just how screwed up they are. I started this project with Barack (the Schlock) Obama because he’s been the big surprise this year – another reason Republicans all over America are being stupid by choosing a field of Democrat wannabes for their candidate.

Obama is KICKING HITLERY’S ASS in the primaries. Not well enough to beat her, but clearly well enough to drain her resources enough to put WHOMEVER WE WANT into the White House with as little fight from the Left as possible. Instead, we send in our most left-leaning senators and governors, virtually guaranteeing either a Hitlery presidency or a liberal Republican, which is just as bad – especially considering these assholes are all claiming to be conservative. Well, it worked for da Schickmeister; might as well try it in our party. NOT.

Of course, anyone who comes to this blog with any degree of frequency knows that my biggest beef with both Democrats and Republicans is their ignorance of the limits placed upon them by the Constitution. This tidbit of research on the five remaining candidates will, as one would expect, focus on this matter.

Before I get into this, I want to explain how I arrived at my result. This was a difficult bit of research to do, given that Obama’s website is annoyingly overrun with redundancies that forced me to stop reading about halfway through it. Not my favorite thing to do, but there was plenty there (redundancy notwithstanding) to get a good clear picture of what this guy says he’s going to do. I reviewed over a hundred proposals/promises, and I cannot emphasize enough that the warnings are all right there on Obama’s campaign site. Elect this man at your own peril.

Before I get into the verdict, I’ll pay Obama a compliment. There was one thing I saw n his site that was clearly refreshing, and I think any conservative would strongly support it:

As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.

Refreshing indeed. Not too shabby coming from a Donk. Sounds more like something Fred or Ron Paul would advocate.

Still, it’s nowhere near enough by any measure to elect Barack Obama to the office of President of the United States. His site also reveals that he supports Hitlerycare, something he has fought Mrs. Clinton tooth and nail over throughout this primary season. Mr. Obama, universal health care is universal health care. You’re better off just agreeing with the bitch on that one and trying to find somewhere you differ, however difficult that may be. Mr. Obama also has published a blatant and obvious lie on his website for all to see (if they decide to read it). the site asserts that Obama is:

… the only 2008 candidate to have sponsored Russ Feingold’s tough bill to reform the presidential public financing system.

Not that that’s a good thing, even if it were true that Obama, and not John McShithead were the driving force in sponsoring that bill. Here, Obama’s campaign is openly supporting the blatant repeal of the First Amendment that is McCain-Feingold (not Obama-Feingold).

With allowances made for redundant statements, Mr. Obama’s proposals came in at a whopping 84% – yes, you read that right, EIGHTY-FOUR PERCENT – unconstitutional (read that ILLEGAL). Fully eighty-four percent of what Mr. Obama wants to do as president is outside the legal boundaries of that office and/or the federal government. And that’s only stopping halfway. What’s the likelihood that the other half would be any better? I say nil. In fact, given all the repetition I endured in reading this guy’s platform, I’d say I’d most likely be reading more of the same stuff I’d already read. Not a very well-written website. At least when I endured Ron Paul’s platform, everything I read was new material when I read it.

Next in the corsshairs: Hitlery.


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

And Another Thing …

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 6, 2008

As I was out and about the blogosphere today, I happened upon a site that encourages people to do what I did yesterday and will probably do in November …


Also, there has also been a wee bit of scuttlebutt about a new conservative party rising out of this mess.  I hope the advice I gave (the Reagan2020 New Federalist Platform and the 1840 Democratic Party Platform would be great places to start) is well-heeded.

Both of the above are great ideas.  Lord knows the Republicans aren’t doing their job any better than the Democrats.


Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

Yeah, OK …

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 6, 2008

OK. I celebrated my blogoversary by taking some time off … Please call 1-800-EAT-SHIT with any complaints.

Yeah, so the Asshole had some big wins yesterday. I voted for Fred, so don’t blame me when you’re sitting at home next January watching yet another liberal lie to America with the words “and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

These idiots have been trampling upon the Constitution like a doormat for twenty years. The American people are at fault, though, because they (including you and I) keep electing these scumbags.

I’ll be doing my homework for the next 8 or 9 months, but it looks right now like I’ll be writing in Fred Thompson in November. With John McShitbag the likely nominee (and the ONLY candidate on the Republican side that I’d NEVER cast a vote for – not even for dog catcher), it’s a long shot that I’ll be voting for the Republican. Of course, a lot can change, but I’m not all that impressed with Huckabee or Romney at this point, either – though I may hold my nose for one of them.

I recently took a trip over to my blogfather’s website, which I admit I’ve not been to nearly enough, and find that the posts there are right there with the things I’ve been saying about the Republicans (and, for the record, Fred Thompson). I’ll definitely be hanging out there quite a bit. It’s a shame the Emperor is foreign-born. He’d make a great president. See for yourself.

Don’t let the tone of my recent posts (including this one) fool you.  I’m still as optimistic as ever.  It is important, though, to properly communicate the truth about the very sad state of affairs in America right now.  The Founders must be rolling over in their graves.


Posted in Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Blogoversary Tomorrow!

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 31, 2008

Yes, I know I’ve been quiet, and it hasn’t necessarily been due to a lack of time or thoughts.  Still, I plan to keep blogging – and being as loud a voice as I can for the cause of the Founding Fathers, which seems to be in some serious jeopardy.  Realistically, four candidates remain for President of the US, and all of them are liberals, including the Republicans.

We vote here on Super Tuesday, and Fred Thompson, though withdrawn from the race, is on the ballot.  I will be casting my vote for him, both on Tuesday, and as a write-in in the November election.  Pro-Thompson advertising will continue on this site as well.

What, you say?  Rocker not vote for the Republican in an election this crucial to America’s future?  Consider the following: My vote will not influence the outcome, and we’re stuck with a useless liberal in the White House regardless.  I can cast a “statement vote” with no need to worry about its ultimate effect on the outcome.  New Jersey consistently goes to the Democrat in election after election.  The people of this state consistently elect liberal governors (the last “conservative” governor was Tom Kean), and ones that are as dangerous as Hitlery (Florio, McGreevey, Corzine).  Even Christine Todd Whitman was RINO to the max.  As as result, we already have here what Hitlery, Barack, Mitt, and McCain are trying to get for America.  The reason I stay here is family and friends.  Roots are roots.  Not much you can do at this stage of life except to do what you can to change things in the hope that there will be some benefit for your children and grandchildren.

Which is what I intend to do.  The Founding Fathers did not put their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the line so that we could all just sit here and piss their dream away.  It is up to ALL who cherish that dream to stand up to these liberals and win back the freedom that these men fought and died for.  I am up to the task.  I will do everything in my power to rescue this ideal from those who threaten it.  I believe in the wisdom of the American people, and that once reality sets in, the America of our Founders will be at hand.

I do believe that the time is finally here for conservatives to form ourselves a new party – one dedicated to re-establishing the freedoms that our forefathers gave us, and that the Left has taken away.  It seems to me that that will be the only way Americans will listen.  The major parties are finally devoid of all credibility when it comes to American history and ideals.  If Mitt Romney is the best the Republicans can do, then they’re just as out of touch as the Democrats.  I would suggest naming the party the “Federalist” or “Patriot” party in honor of those who stood up for freedom over two centuries ago.  THIS will be the true party of Ronald Reagan, not these idiot liberals who consistently try to portray themselves as the next Reagan when they aren’t even fit to lick his decomposing ass.

The education of America must begin now, and without delay.  I’m up to the task.  Are you?


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

The Future of the Thompson Conservative

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 25, 2008

Folks, this is really simple.

Fred’s taken his hat out of the game (I’d argue he took it out right after Iowa). Ron Paul is still nutty as a fruitcake. The rest of the field just isn’t conservative. John McCain? Please. If that guy’s the nominee, I’m writing my own name in on Election Day.

Still, the message of Fred Thompson’s candidacy rings true, and his influence on the debate is clear. Everyone’s trying to be Reagan, even John McCain, who Bonzo would probably punch square if the face if he were alive today to do so. Who brought Reagan conservatism to the debate? Fred Thompson. Now all the liberal Republicans are trying to out-Reagan each other. What a joke. The truth is that the Republican Party just isn’t conservative anymore. Rush has even started saying so (though I’ve been saying that about the Republican leadership – especially George W. Bush – for some time now).

So what’s a conservative to do? Who does a conservative vote for? I’ll be looking at that a bit more closely in the near future, but if I’m not satisfied, I’m voting write-in. Never mind loony third parties like the Libertarians who for all of their good ideas can’t find the votes to run a candidate for dog catcher.

Perhaps it’s time for conservatives across America to unite. Time for Reagan Federalists to invite Libertarians and the Constitutionites (who should be called the Religion Party) to the table to create the new Federalist party here in America to implement the New Federalism advocated by Reagan2020.org. If there won’t be a voice for those of us who revere the Founders’ vision in the two major parties, then maybe it’s time to take our ball and go back to Independence Hall. President Reagan often said he did not leave the Democrat Party, but rather that the party left him. The Republicans have done the same thing to us. A new party would perhaps give the Democrats victories for some time, but the end result would be better, with America knowing the truth about the Constitution and those who sacrificed so much for us to have it. It will be our job to educate America, and it will be a lot of work. Maybe a Hitlery presidency would be helpful, as was the Carter presidency of the 1970’s.

America’s best days are ahead of her. Still, the dark period that seems to be the result of the 2008 election will be a formidable obstacle to overcome.

Who’s with me?


Posted in Conservative Wins, Decision 2008, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Fred Wants to Win

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 14, 2008

Perfect message, but just a little too late, say some South Carolinians.  I say bullshit.

If you agree with the message of the candidate, whether that candidate is Fred Thompson, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuiliani, Mitt, McCain, or even Hitlery, then you have a RESPONSIBILITY to vote that way in the primaries.  That’s what primaries are for – finding out which candidate is most in line with the beliefs and philosophies of the party’s voters.  If you think Fred’s message is perfect, then you absolutely MUST cast your primary vote that way.

Interestingly enough, Fred’s message is the one that happens to be closest to President Reagan’s (I’m bringing that up since the South Carolina debate seemed to be a contest of who could be the most Reagan-like).  Don’t you just love Rudy’s statement that he would mount a 50-state campaign to win the election just like Reagan did – made on the very same day he pulled all his staffers out of South Carolina and Michigan?  Nice 50-state campaign, you dork.  Rush often says that conservatism wins every time it’s tried, and I do believe he’s right.  Americans gravitate toward it, and its implementation is always successful.  Indeed, when a conservative president gets into trouble, it’s almost always for doing something liberal – like raise taxes.

There’s no doubt in my mind that Fred Thompson wants to win this election.  None at all.  However, his campaign staff stopped sending emails right after the Iowa caucuses.  How exactly do they expect to raise the needed funds to get anywhere?  How do they think we’re going to get the only electable conservative elected by just sitting around on their asses and doing nothing?

To the Thompson campaign, I say this:  Get off your sorry asses and get them into gear.  Fred is the last hope we have of having a conservative president take over in 2009 after 20 years of liberal bullshit in the White House.  Other than Fred, neither party offers anything but liberals.  This election should be a breeze – and the primaries should be the easy part.  Why are you idiots making such a farce out of it?


Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Iowa: Winners and Losers

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 5, 2008

The results are in in Iowa.

With all the resources she poured into Iowa, it’s a HUGE loss for Hitlery, and just as huge a win for Barack the Schlock. Make no mistake about it, Democrats there went for the newcomer, and BIG.

On our side, Fred Thompson was the clear winner of the three conservatives in the race, and if this caucus meant anything to Duncan Hunter, he’s done.

I also don’t see this as a huge win for Mike Huckabee, as he has a following in Iowa that simply cannot be discounted. Congratulations to him on the victory, but he’s not looking at doing as well elsewhere. Romney was as big a loser as Hitlery, thank God. Mitt was counting on Iowa, and will now have to rethink his strategy.

So, the biggest winner of the day was obviously Barack Obama. Hard to say whether the bigger loser is Hitlery or Mitt, as they both had put a lot into this one, and were both counting on easy wins. Hell, even The Breck Girl edged that witch out by a few tenths of a point!

As a note here, most analyses of Huckabee will show that he generally believes in conservative principles, but he also advocates using the government as an engine for applying them, even where the Constitution doesn’t allow it. This is the reason I have not been including Huck in the “conservative” camp. Abortion is the perfect example. Huck and real conservatives like myself (yes I know every conservative considers his own brand of conservatism as the only “real” brand of conservatism, but at least those of my stripe have the Constitution to stand with) both agree that abortion is the termination of a human life that should have been protected, and I applaud his work in getting a human life amendment passed in Arkansas. While I do support a federal amendment of that nature, I do not support any language contained therein making abortion a federal crime. After all, murder isn’t a federal crime, so why should abortion be? Let the states have that jurisdiction (which can easily be included in any human life amendment, by the way). Huckabee has explicitly stated that the states shouldn’t have this power, even though the Constitution doesn’t offer it to the fed – one size fits all, the typical liberal way of doing things. The overall analysis of Huck’s lack of conservative application of his conservative beliefs is material for another post.

Here’s something Sage will love to hear: Ron Paul beat Rudy 10.1% to 3.5%. I’m liking this too, except for one little detail: Rudy didn’t bother campaigning in Iowa, so who could have expected him to perform there? This makes it hard to gauge how successful he may have been, as he obviously didn’t care much how he did there – and I have NO information on what the Paul campaign was up to in Iowa.

As for the Thompson campaign, we did do a lot of work in Iowa, and were expecting somewhere between 10 and 15% of the vote. With that accomplished, we can move on to New Hampshire understanding that we have reached our goal so far. This caucus pretty much shows that Fred is the best-chanced conservative in the race.

In the meantime, it’s on to New Hampshire. Congrats to Mike and Barack. Go Fred!


Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Decision 2008, New FedeRWRalism, RWRandom Thoughts | Leave a Comment »