RightWingRocker

Never mind the pajamas … We blog in the nude!

Archive for the ‘Confronting Libs’ Category

The Republican Nominee: Johnny McScrewUs

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 10, 2008

OK, so now it’s time to take a look at the Republican contenders. I won’t worry about Mitt, because he’s all but out of it now, but I’ll definitely consider a look at Huckabee if the idea seems fairly worthwhile at the time. For now here’s my constitutional analysis of John McCain (and that’s probably the last time you’ll see me use his real name around here – as undeserved as it is in the first place).

For starters, I’ve exercised the utmost fairness here by only evaluating the platform expressed on Mr. McBullshit’s campaign website. Given that he’s trying to appeal to conservatives (too late idiot, we aren’t half asleep like the rest of America), he made sure that the things that WE stand for were emphasized, so it’s important to take these results (like those of Barack and Hitlery) with a grain of salt. Hitlery was working to conceal her extreme socialist agenda, and Obama was working to inundate you with so much you wouldn’t have a legitimate opportunity to make sense of it all – both in the hope that you would vote for them based on some ridiculous concept of “change”. What they seem to be advocating is change for change’s sake rather than encouraging you to look closely at the changes they advocate and THEN decide for whom to vote. Seriously, a change that involves expanding the illegal socialist agenda that’s been the order of the day for the last three quarters of a century is clearly not the kind of change that America needs, and I would hope it’s not the kind of change she would want.

That being said, I took a look at the agenda that Johnny McFeingold was selling on his website. some of this stuff was a bunch of outright lies. There’s plenty of bullshit on McDumbass’s site, and I imagine much of it will be confronted during the campaign. It’s sad to note that this scumbag seems to be the last hope America has of avoiding a Hitlery presidency (unless the Schlock can somehow pull off a win – in which case Hitlery will be back to try again, mark my words).

Of course, the benefit of four years of ANY Democrat (including J. McC.) should not be overlooked. Four years of Jimmy Carter gave us eight years of Ronald Reagan, and an economic boom that even eight years of Bill Clinton couldn’t stop. This is a great reason to support the current write-in campaign for Fred Thompson. Conservatives have nothing to lose. We either win the campaign and get Thompson elected, or we make a strong statement that can’t be ignored in 2012. A strong showing for Fred takes away the liberal mandate each of the four liberals still in the race would otherwise have.

Back to The asshole. While McDorkus made a pretty good showing here in this review, some of the things he’s wrong on are just too wrong to just sit back and accept (Scamnesty and his sponsoring of a bill that, for all intents and purposes, repealed the First Amendment). Some things, as I will point out, are inappropriately inconsistent. Still, McWhatTheHellAmIDoingHere was able to get a grade of 77% constitutional based upon those things that he openly advocates in his platform.

Before you go and get excited about this and go and vote for the guy, let me remind you of a couple of tidbits: McCain-Kennedy and McCain-Feingold.

Both of these are absolute slaps in the face of the conservative movement. You’d think a Senator from a border state, particularly one with Mexico’s reputation, would have some clue when it came to illegal aliens and their shenanigans, but does he?? Nope. Not at all. Does a conservative with presidential aspirations sponsor a bill that, for all intents and purposes, repeals the First Amendment? Wait till you see what else came up in this research.

First, let’s address the blatant lies that this idiot posts on his site. Check out this quote from the section entitled “Strict Constructionist Philosophy” (as if someone repealing important tenets of the Bill of Rights could even assert himself as a “strict constructionist”):

We are a free people. This means that the rules we have agreed to live by are those made by the people themselves, not a small elite that claims to be wiser than everybody else.

If Johnny-wad believed this, he wouldn’t, on the same website, be touting his “achievements” with regard to campaign finance reform, in which he basically tells us that these same free people don’t have the right to put our money into political campaigns as we see fit, or say what we want about candidates whenever the fuck we damned well please, as the First Amendment is supposed to guarantee. This is a blatant lie, and I’m not falling for it. You shouldn’t either.

Also, some inconsistencies should be addressed. In a section entitled “Second Amendment Rights”, we first are handed this line, as if this candidate really belived it (which he may or may not, but hear me out):

John McCain believes that banning ammunition is just another way to undermine Second Amendment rights.

OK. So I’m supposed to believe that Jizz McJerkoff believes that banning ammunition is “just another way to undermine Second Amendment rights”, when in the next breath I get THIS line of bullshit?

John McCain supports instant criminal background checks to help prohibit criminals from buying firearms …

Last time I checked, those who owed a debt to society were either in prison or under probationary contract not to carry. People who have taken this position have more often than not extended their position to include those who have completed their sentence and have returned to their homes and families. Defining these people as “criminals” and denying them the right to own, carry, and use firearms is an extremely heinous violation of their Second Amendment rights. It is clearly fair to say that anyone considered safe to be out in public unsupervised should not be denied this right. After all, who will defend them against the criminals wearing badges; or worse, the criminals in state capitals and in Washington (including John McCain himself) who commit the very types of crimes I have brought to the fore in this post?

So take it with a grain of salt, but these are the results. That grain of salt is a necessary thing these days, especially with regard to these liberals. Hitlery left a lot of very important shit out. Barack repeated himself to the point of total confusion. McAbel’sMurderer hides illegal positions within legal ones and has a record of repealing rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Next we’ll see what the Huckster would do to America.

RWR

Related: Hitlery Clinton: 68% unconstitutional – 2/8/2008
Barack Obama – 84% Unconstitutional – 2/7/2008

Advertisements

Posted in Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Playing it Smart: Hitlery

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 8, 2008

As promised, here’s the research on Hitlery’s proposals as outlined on her web site. A few notes about this research, as this site was much easier to navigate and was much better in its presentation than that of Barack Hussein bin Obama. The numbers were very surprising, though this could be blamed either on the redundancy of Obama’s presentation OR the simple fact that Hitlery is very smart in the way she presents things so as to make it seem good for America when the reverse is true.

I grabbed a quote or two that I found interesting. These two quotes were presented in the context of ripping President Bush for his understandable opposition to embryonic stem cell research, but it doesn’t take a very close look to see the disingenuousness in the statement. Simply apply them to her position on AIDS or, more obviously, man-made global warming, and you get the picture.

[Clinton will] ban political appointees from unduly interfering with scientific conclusions and publications.

This will be true ONLY as long as those “scientific conclusions and publications” are in sync with whatever she believes (or better, believes will increase her power).

It is important to … ensure that the President receives objective, fact-based advice.

OK. I’m going to cut in early here. The quote continues below. Again, what if the President gets objective, fact-based advice (Lord knows there’s already plenty of it out there) that suggests that there is nothing to worry about with regard to “global warming”, and that it’s not necessary to do anything to try to stop something that’s either not happening at all or, at least, is not being influenced by human activity? Do you really believe she’s going to accept that as “objective, fact-based advice”? I can answer that with two words: FAT FUCKING CHANCE (OK … three words. Who’s counting anyway?)

Hillary Clinton will reverse the Bush Administration’s irresponsible politicization of science.

and we are to believe this because? We’ve had eight years of a Republican president who has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to reverse prior administrations’ blatant, irresponsible, and frankly disgusting politicization of science vis-a-vis AIDS and “the environment”. Are we really to believe that Hitlery, who could have influenced her ex-President husband to do just that (and didn’t) is going to change this? BULLSHIT.

And this research, unfortunately, only reviews the constitutionality (read that LEGALITY) of those things shown on her website. Her prior assaults on the First and Second Amendments and how she would continue them are curiously omitted. So, how does her platform stack up against the Constitution of the United States of America? It comes in at 68% unconstitutional. More than two thirds of the things she admits to advocating are blatantly illegal under the limitations placed upon her as president, and frankly, as Senator – the office she currently holds.

Is she more dangerous that Barack the Schlock? Not likely. Her convenient omissions would definitely play well with the socialists in Congress, particularly Pelosi and her minions. None of them give a rat’s ass after a cheese shit what the Constitution says their limitations are. Barack at least tells you what he’s about on his website, even if he never mentions it in public. There could be omissions there, but who would expect that from a guy who keeps saying the same things over and over and over? Besides, we have had eight years of a president whom we elected for that very reason, and the only real benefits were healthy tax cuts and a strong stand on terrorism. No Child Left Behind? Please.

Just more proof that no liberal is fit for office in the US government. Next up: Johnny McShitPie

RWR

Related:
Barack Obama – 84% Unconstitutional – 2/7/2008

Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

A Little Research: Obama

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 7, 2008

This will be much more important when I do it for the Republicans, i know, because that will show just how screwed up they are. I started this project with Barack (the Schlock) Obama because he’s been the big surprise this year – another reason Republicans all over America are being stupid by choosing a field of Democrat wannabes for their candidate.

Obama is KICKING HITLERY’S ASS in the primaries. Not well enough to beat her, but clearly well enough to drain her resources enough to put WHOMEVER WE WANT into the White House with as little fight from the Left as possible. Instead, we send in our most left-leaning senators and governors, virtually guaranteeing either a Hitlery presidency or a liberal Republican, which is just as bad – especially considering these assholes are all claiming to be conservative. Well, it worked for da Schickmeister; might as well try it in our party. NOT.

Of course, anyone who comes to this blog with any degree of frequency knows that my biggest beef with both Democrats and Republicans is their ignorance of the limits placed upon them by the Constitution. This tidbit of research on the five remaining candidates will, as one would expect, focus on this matter.

Before I get into this, I want to explain how I arrived at my result. This was a difficult bit of research to do, given that Obama’s website is annoyingly overrun with redundancies that forced me to stop reading about halfway through it. Not my favorite thing to do, but there was plenty there (redundancy notwithstanding) to get a good clear picture of what this guy says he’s going to do. I reviewed over a hundred proposals/promises, and I cannot emphasize enough that the warnings are all right there on Obama’s campaign site. Elect this man at your own peril.

Before I get into the verdict, I’ll pay Obama a compliment. There was one thing I saw n his site that was clearly refreshing, and I think any conservative would strongly support it:

As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.

Refreshing indeed. Not too shabby coming from a Donk. Sounds more like something Fred or Ron Paul would advocate.

Still, it’s nowhere near enough by any measure to elect Barack Obama to the office of President of the United States. His site also reveals that he supports Hitlerycare, something he has fought Mrs. Clinton tooth and nail over throughout this primary season. Mr. Obama, universal health care is universal health care. You’re better off just agreeing with the bitch on that one and trying to find somewhere you differ, however difficult that may be. Mr. Obama also has published a blatant and obvious lie on his website for all to see (if they decide to read it). the site asserts that Obama is:

… the only 2008 candidate to have sponsored Russ Feingold’s tough bill to reform the presidential public financing system.

Not that that’s a good thing, even if it were true that Obama, and not John McShithead were the driving force in sponsoring that bill. Here, Obama’s campaign is openly supporting the blatant repeal of the First Amendment that is McCain-Feingold (not Obama-Feingold).

With allowances made for redundant statements, Mr. Obama’s proposals came in at a whopping 84% – yes, you read that right, EIGHTY-FOUR PERCENT – unconstitutional (read that ILLEGAL). Fully eighty-four percent of what Mr. Obama wants to do as president is outside the legal boundaries of that office and/or the federal government. And that’s only stopping halfway. What’s the likelihood that the other half would be any better? I say nil. In fact, given all the repetition I endured in reading this guy’s platform, I’d say I’d most likely be reading more of the same stuff I’d already read. Not a very well-written website. At least when I endured Ron Paul’s platform, everything I read was new material when I read it.

Next in the corsshairs: Hitlery.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

From the Desk of Delftsman …

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 6, 2008

Delfts has been kinda quiet of late, but has posted a few times recently. I hope he’s doing well. Today I found this posted at his blog.

Am Your Worst Nightmare. I am a BAD American.

I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid level governmental functionary, be it Democratic or Republican!

I believe that owning a gun doesn’t make you a killer, I believe it makes you a smart American. (Unless you own a gun and are afraid to use it.)

I believe that being a minority does not make you noble or victimized, and does not entitle you to anything.

I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, do it in English.

I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.

My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever canceled Jerry Springer.

I don’t hate the rich. I don’t pity the poor.

I know wrestling is fake and I don’t waste my time watching or arguing about it.

I’ve never owned a slave, or was a slave, and I WILL NOT pay reparations for something that I didn’t do.

I haven’t burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So shut up already.

This is AMERICA, I believe if you don’t like the way things are here, go back to where you came from and change your own country!

I want to know which church it is exactly, where the Reverend Jesse Jackson preaches, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution. Can I get an AMEN on that one?

I think the cops have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you’re running from them, because if you’re not guilty, WHY are you running?

I also think the cops have the right to pull you over if you’re breaking the law, regardless of what color you are, that’s the job we’re paying them to do.

(RWR note: I further believe that if the cops are violating your constitutional rights, you have the constitutional right to use your gun against them – this is what the Second amendment is for.)

And, no, I don’t mind having my face shown on my drivers license. I think it’s good, it lets you know it’s really me.

I’m proud that the word ‘God’ is written on my money.

I believe that if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, I don’t want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.

I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me stuff or trying to guilt me into making ‘donations’ to their cause.

I believe that it doesn’t take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.

I believe ‘illegal’ is illegal no matter what the lawmakers think.

(RWR note: If lawmakers want to create laws that deem things illegal, they should make those laws simple and easy enough to read and understand without the aid of a lawyer.)

I believe the American flag should be the only one allowed to fly over American soil! If you want to fly the flag of YOUR nation at the top of a flag pole, by all means, do so, IN YOUR OWN NATION! And if the American flag is NOT your flag, then this is NOT your nation.

If this makes me a BAD American or causes you to classify me as a racist, then yes, I’m a BAD American and a racist.

If you’re a BAD American, if you share the same feelings and beliefs that I do, please, copy and post this on your web site for everyone to see.

We want our country back! GOD BLESS AMERICA!

AMEN.

Delfts always seems to hit it out of the park, doesn’t he?

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

And Another Thing …

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 6, 2008

As I was out and about the blogosphere today, I happened upon a site that encourages people to do what I did yesterday and will probably do in November …

http://www.WriteInFred.com

Also, there has also been a wee bit of scuttlebutt about a new conservative party rising out of this mess.  I hope the advice I gave (the Reagan2020 New Federalist Platform and the 1840 Democratic Party Platform would be great places to start) is well-heeded.

Both of the above are great ideas.  Lord knows the Republicans aren’t doing their job any better than the Democrats.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

Blogoversary Tomorrow!

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 31, 2008

Yes, I know I’ve been quiet, and it hasn’t necessarily been due to a lack of time or thoughts.  Still, I plan to keep blogging – and being as loud a voice as I can for the cause of the Founding Fathers, which seems to be in some serious jeopardy.  Realistically, four candidates remain for President of the US, and all of them are liberals, including the Republicans.

We vote here on Super Tuesday, and Fred Thompson, though withdrawn from the race, is on the ballot.  I will be casting my vote for him, both on Tuesday, and as a write-in in the November election.  Pro-Thompson advertising will continue on this site as well.

What, you say?  Rocker not vote for the Republican in an election this crucial to America’s future?  Consider the following: My vote will not influence the outcome, and we’re stuck with a useless liberal in the White House regardless.  I can cast a “statement vote” with no need to worry about its ultimate effect on the outcome.  New Jersey consistently goes to the Democrat in election after election.  The people of this state consistently elect liberal governors (the last “conservative” governor was Tom Kean), and ones that are as dangerous as Hitlery (Florio, McGreevey, Corzine).  Even Christine Todd Whitman was RINO to the max.  As as result, we already have here what Hitlery, Barack, Mitt, and McCain are trying to get for America.  The reason I stay here is family and friends.  Roots are roots.  Not much you can do at this stage of life except to do what you can to change things in the hope that there will be some benefit for your children and grandchildren.

Which is what I intend to do.  The Founding Fathers did not put their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the line so that we could all just sit here and piss their dream away.  It is up to ALL who cherish that dream to stand up to these liberals and win back the freedom that these men fought and died for.  I am up to the task.  I will do everything in my power to rescue this ideal from those who threaten it.  I believe in the wisdom of the American people, and that once reality sets in, the America of our Founders will be at hand.

I do believe that the time is finally here for conservatives to form ourselves a new party – one dedicated to re-establishing the freedoms that our forefathers gave us, and that the Left has taken away.  It seems to me that that will be the only way Americans will listen.  The major parties are finally devoid of all credibility when it comes to American history and ideals.  If Mitt Romney is the best the Republicans can do, then they’re just as out of touch as the Democrats.  I would suggest naming the party the “Federalist” or “Patriot” party in honor of those who stood up for freedom over two centuries ago.  THIS will be the true party of Ronald Reagan, not these idiot liberals who consistently try to portray themselves as the next Reagan when they aren’t even fit to lick his decomposing ass.

The education of America must begin now, and without delay.  I’m up to the task.  Are you?

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Fred Wants to Win

Posted by RightWingRocker on January 14, 2008

Perfect message, but just a little too late, say some South Carolinians.  I say bullshit.

If you agree with the message of the candidate, whether that candidate is Fred Thompson, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuiliani, Mitt, McCain, or even Hitlery, then you have a RESPONSIBILITY to vote that way in the primaries.  That’s what primaries are for – finding out which candidate is most in line with the beliefs and philosophies of the party’s voters.  If you think Fred’s message is perfect, then you absolutely MUST cast your primary vote that way.

Interestingly enough, Fred’s message is the one that happens to be closest to President Reagan’s (I’m bringing that up since the South Carolina debate seemed to be a contest of who could be the most Reagan-like).  Don’t you just love Rudy’s statement that he would mount a 50-state campaign to win the election just like Reagan did – made on the very same day he pulled all his staffers out of South Carolina and Michigan?  Nice 50-state campaign, you dork.  Rush often says that conservatism wins every time it’s tried, and I do believe he’s right.  Americans gravitate toward it, and its implementation is always successful.  Indeed, when a conservative president gets into trouble, it’s almost always for doing something liberal – like raise taxes.

There’s no doubt in my mind that Fred Thompson wants to win this election.  None at all.  However, his campaign staff stopped sending emails right after the Iowa caucuses.  How exactly do they expect to raise the needed funds to get anywhere?  How do they think we’re going to get the only electable conservative elected by just sitting around on their asses and doing nothing?

To the Thompson campaign, I say this:  Get off your sorry asses and get them into gear.  Fred is the last hope we have of having a conservative president take over in 2009 after 20 years of liberal bullshit in the White House.  Other than Fred, neither party offers anything but liberals.  This election should be a breeze – and the primaries should be the easy part.  Why are you idiots making such a farce out of it?

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Decision 2008, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

The Clintonesque Mitt Romney

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 20, 2007

Remember back during one of the Bill Clinton campaigns, ol’ Bubba spoke of how he had watched black churches burn as a child, even though there was no opportunity for him to do so?

So much for Mitt Romney’s “front-runner” status. He’s all the liar Slick Willie was. Yeah, sure. He watched his old man march with Dr. King. Believe that, and I have some oceanfront property in Colorado to sell you.

Look. We had eight years of this, and voted out two more Democrats who were prone to this sort of lying. There’s a reason for that. We saw where it got us the first time, and paid the price for re-electing the crook. So certain were we that we didn’t want that, we elected a straight-shooter of a Republican, knowing full well he wasn’t the conservative we needed – pretty much because he told us the truth. Say what you want about George W. Bush; he told us what he’d do, and he delivered.

I hope America sees this for what it is and hands this idiot his walking papers. Republicans, PLEASE do not put me in a situation where I have to vote for this clown just to keep Hitlery out. Keep the pressure on for the only conservative with a chance – Fred Thompson. Thank God he’s getting some new momentum. Idiots like Romney only hurt Republican credibility by showing the useless liberal side of the party.

RWR

Posted in Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

The Federalist 2008: Part the First

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 16, 2007

Throughout the last nearly three years as one of the Rightosphere’s louder voices in support of the Founding Fathers’ dream, I have built much of my relevant writing around the following statement, found in the New Federalist Platform, as submitted by Reagan2020.org:

We call ourselves “Federalists” because we humbly acknowledge that our guidance derives from the original ideals and principles of federally distributed powers as explicated by The Federalist Papers. But we are “New” Federalists for two basic reasons: first, because we are well aware that the cautionary warnings of the Anti-Federalists have proven true about the central government embarking on a long crusade of usurpations and encroachments that have substantially abridged the rights of individual citizens and state and local governments; and second, because we follow in the tradition of New Federalism that was implemented under Ronald Reagan’s presidency, but has since then languished. We strive to reassert the principles of New Federalism, to roll back those abridgements and infringements of our rights as plainly set forth in our Founding Documents.

Indeed, the Federalist Papers, written largely in defense of the Constitution in the wake of much dissent with regard to the document, were very persuasive in ultimately bringing forth ratification, and the warnings of the Anti-Federalists have largely come to fruition as well. One would have to be completely blind to the situation in America today to believe otherwise.

Recently, on a thread over at RWN, I took a stand in favor of the Founders and their vision. I even posted about it. My argument is simply that conservatives are dropping the ball when they argue with liberals on the liberals’ terms. Why? Simple: These arguments were had back in the Eighteenth Century, and the Founders had the opportunity to explain themselves. The decisions about the meaning of the Constitution were made then, and the liberals of the 20th Century have succeeded in convincing an uneducated public that the Constitution says something different. It’s time to reinvigorate the enthusiasm of the American people for the true vision of the Founding Fathers by reintroducing the public discourse of their time into the public discourse of today. It only makes sense, given the liberals’ constant desire to inject the evil of the federal government more and more into our daily lives.

On the aforementioned comment thread at RWN, I successfully got liberals to take (among others) the following positions:

* That socialism is allowed in the US under the general welfare clause of Article 1, Section 8.

* That James Madison would advocate socialism and/or nationalist socialist healthcare.

* That James Madison and the Founding Fathers are irrelevant.

I prodded these guys about Madison quite heavily to get these responses, given that Madison – the biggest contributor to the Constitution from a content standpoint – would clearly NOT have advocated socialism being injected into our lives, especially to the degree that it is today. This discussion of Article 1, Section 8 was had 220 years ago, and the rationale for the wording of the article was made clear then. To ignore the discourse of the founding generation and/or call it “irrelevant” is sheer foollishness and idiocy.

The legislative power is competent to lay taxes, duties, imposts, and excises; — there is no limitation to this power, unless it be said that the clause which directs the use to which those taxes, and duties shall be applied, may be said to be a limitation: but this is no restriction of the power at all, for by this clause they are to be applied to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but the legislature have authority to contract debts at their discretion; they are the sole judges of what is necessary to provide for the common defence, and they only are to determine what is for the general welfare; this power therefore is neither more nor less, than a power to lay and collect taxes, imposts, and excises, at their pleasure; not only [is] the power to lay taxes unlimited, as to the amount they may require, but it is perfect and absolute to raise them in any mode they please. – Brutus #1

So the challenge to the Constitution was made then, as you can see. Madison responded as follows:

The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. – Madison, Federalist 45

Have I not been consisitent in saying that the states have the authority to have socialism within their own systems if they so (foolishly) choose, but that the federal government does not? I have yet to find a liberal who would advocate turning the federal socialist machine over to the individual states. One size fits all is the only thing they know. Government is always the only solution, even when government is the stupidest option available (and legally, it is not available – or so say the Constitution and its primary author). To say that James Madison, who penned the above words in defense of ratification, would have supported the efforts being made today to expand upon the socialism, which he would have denounced, by extending federal powers to include control over people’s healthcare decisions is, at best, ignorance, and at worst, a deliberate lie perpetrated for the purpose of cheating the American people out of more of their tax dollars in support of another lunatic ponzi scheme.

Today, we are seeing the concerns of the Anti-Federalist coming to fruition, and it’s happening right before our very eyes (baby, what a big surprise). It’s happening, and all the liberals can do in their defense when we so clearly demonstrate that their vision is so inconsistent with that of the Founders is call the Founders “irrelevant” and/or lie about what their true positions would be. I’m sorry folks, but I just don’t buy the idea that they don’t know. I might believe that about Joe Publick and the rest of the victims of the public education system, but you had better believe those in Washington and those seeking the nod to go there know better. Trust me. They know better – and better than you’ll ever know.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

Poll: Thompson Wins in Stupid Debate

Posted by RightWingRocker on December 1, 2007

No. I didn’t watch the stupid debate this week. New Years is coming up, and there’s lots of preparation with a new band and all. First gig with them, in fact. Still, I found this poll Hawk did very interesting.

Who won the debate?

Tom Tancredo: 2%
Duncan Hunter: 6%
Rudy Giuliani: 7%
John McCain: 7%
Mitt Romney: 12%
Mike Huckabee: 22%
Fred Thompson: 44%

Who lost the debate?

Duncan Hunter: 1%
Tom Tancredo: 2%
John McCain: 3%
Mike Huckabee: 4%
Fred Thompson: 6%
Mitt Romney: 21%
Rudy Giuliani: 24%
Ron Paul: 40%

One thing was missing, though. When Hawk does a poll, he often analyzes the net result (in this case, subtracting the negatives from the positives). Here is how that would have panned out:

Guiliani: -14%
Romney: -9%
Tancredo: 0%
McCain: +4%
Hunter: +5%
Huckabee: +18%
Thompson: +38%

An important note on this poll is that Ron Paul was not offered as a choice for the winner. Hawk does this because he often winds up sifting through the pro-Paul vote having to weed out duplicate votes. The Ron Paul crowd simply isn’t honest when it comes to these things, unfortunately, so we will never get an accurate assessment of what people really think of Ron Paul. This is truly unfortunate, because Ron Paul brings something very important to the debate: far-right conservatism. Conservatism largely the way it ought to be. I disagree with Mr. Paul on a few key issues, but his desire to champion the Constitution is nothing short of admirable. Every candidate from every party should be thinking along those lines – another reason I’m a Thompson voter. It would be very useful to know how Americans really feel about Ron Paul because it would give us a better idea of exactly what we face from an education standpoint. Sure, he’s nutty on the war and 9/11, but to know where Americans stand on much of the rest of his platform would be truly instructive and useful in bringing America back into the Constitutional fray.

Anyway, form what I’ve heard about the debate, it was pretty stupid, and even included a Hitlery operative planting a question or two. For Fred to have won this debate is probably something very small, but perhaps the ability to handle himself effectively on the Communist News Network may make it larger. It’s definitely something that must be considered when making a decision, and it’s my sincere hope that Fred will come through in the final analysis.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

Forcing Constitutional Debate at RWN

Posted by RightWingRocker on November 9, 2007

Yesterday, I spent considerable energy arguing with a bunch of liberal morons over at RWN. John correctly brought to the fore the ideology of Norman Thomas, an American socialist from the 1920’s, who basically said that Americans would never accept socialism unless its name was changed – to liberalism. Once this happened, just about any socialist concept could be applied, even here.

Thomas, who ran for President six different times, understood the power of incrementalism. He knew that a socialist agenda in America could only be pursued with the use of deception and half measures, until one day Americans would wake up in a socialized state.

Well, wasn’t that the truth?

American liberals have fallen for Thomas’s passion hook, line, and sinker. Since the post was drawn up in the face of a debate on Hitlerycare, liberal commentors jumped at the chance to defend it. Conservatives fell for their game, unfortuantely, trying to defend the country against this foolishness by arguing on the libs’ terms – in other words, trying to demonstrate why Nationalized Socialized healthcare is such a bad idea compared to why the libs thought otherwise. No one brought up its blatant unconstitutionality.

Until I entered the debate.

Go read the thread. It’s quite enlightening. Here’s the link again.

Over the course of the debate, I was able to get the libs on record as either saying or implying:

1. That socialism is allowed in the US under the general welfare clause of Article 1, Section 8,2. That socialist non-solutions are better than real free-market solutions to problems that were largely a result of socialism (e.g. healthcare regulations).

3. That the cost of lawsuits and malpractice insurance doesn’t drive up the cost of healthcare more than the price of medicine.

4. That government regulation is a good thing, especially for the healthcare industry.

5. That people with BDS are right.

6. That James Madison would advocate socialism and/or nationalist socialist healthcare.

7. That James Madison and the Founding Fathers are irrelevant.

8. That George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and others would have a problem with acknowledging James Madison’s contributions to the US Constitution.

11. That adhering to a “rock solid” Constitution is akin to totalitariansim.

I left out 9 and 10. Seems a lib or two had a problem knowing the difference between the 9th and 10th Amendments. I just don’t want to confuse people – ya know??

The conservatives largely left me to work my magic and came to defend the Constitution after I left the thread.

This is the most important thing we conservatives can do to defend our great nation against the liberals who seek to dismantle everything that has made her great. Far too often we argue on their terms. Why? Their terms are FLAWED. Their terms are BULLSHIT. Their terms are IRRELEVANT.

As long as the Constitution is the law of the land, it must be defended against all enemies. Many of these enemies are holding public office today. These people must be defeated, regardless of their branch of government. The Founders’ vision, as enshrined in the Constitution, MUST prevail.

In order to defeat the socialist liberal onslaught that threatens our country, we must be sure to argue on Constitutional grounds. We must be prepared to use the Constitution in her defense. We must be prepared to call socialism what it is: SOCIALISM. We must be prepared to defend ourselves against these accusations of advocating totalitarianism with facts about real totalitarians and what they advocated.

This is an EASY argument. It takes little or no effort. If you want to defend the Constitution, just know it. Read it. Read the Federalist Papers – AND the Anti-Federalist Papers. Know what the Founders said in its defense. Know why the liberals are full of it and show them. If you like, give them plenty of rope and let them hang themselves as I did yesterday.

This is, I believe, the biggest problem with the way conservatives confront liberals today. There seems to be some need to debate the liberals on the facts of the argument e.g. how much nationalized socialized medicine will cost or how it will affect the choices available as opposed to whether the federal government really has any such authority to begin with. The people of the USA need to be re-educated about the Constitution and what it says, and you know damned right well the schools aren’t going to do anything about it.

If we don’t bring the Constitution back to the front lines of the fight, we are going to have serious problems winning it. If we do, we will win every time. Powerful thing, that US Constitution. Powerful thing. The perfect tribute to the minds that created it.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

Letting the Cat out of the Bag

Posted by RightWingRocker on November 7, 2007

More than just for fun, over the last month or so, I’ve been baiting the hook for liberal assholes who want to come on here and call me a Nazi. Once I started showing the seriousness of my cause, they cowered, as expected. The following posts were part of the deal:

Annoying liberals
You’d Think They’d Be Proud
A Reasonable Liberal

and

A Few Questions

The Hitlery quiz was simply an opportunity to show exactly where she stands on things that matter to people who respect the Founders’ vision and their creation, which is today the greatest nation the world has ever experienced, despite the Left’s attempts to dismantle it.

On to the posts…

If it wasn’t obvious to you that I was getting at some underlying point about the positions taken by the Left (including Hitlery) today, it will be now. If you are sick to death of being called a Nazi for being conservative, hold your head up high today, and gloat.

Just about all of the things I pointed out and asked our liberal friends to defend were taken DIRECTLY FROM THE GERMAN NAZI PARTY PLATFORM. Some points, such as gun control, were taken from the US Constitution, just to throw people off the scent.

About two years ago (probably only Ol’ BC and Sage have been around long enough to remember this), I posted a point-by-point comparison of the Nazi Party Platform and positions typically taken by American liberals and conservatives. Of the 25 points in the platform, liberals matched on seventeen of them. Conservatives matched on three. This is how I knew I had the libs dead to rights with these posts. My only regret is that the only one to come around defending this stuff was someone who, though misguided, never resorted to being a loudmouth or an asshole. Oh, how much fun it would have been to wield the ClueBat then!

That’s right, my friends. If you took my little quiz this week and answered “a” to any of those questions, you were agreeing with the Nazis. My answers, of course, were “b” across the board.

Really. The only places American conservatives would actually agree with the Nazis (shit, even a stopped clock is right twice a day) would be:

* that only citizens of the country should hold public office,
* abolition of taxes on land (conservatives would call this “a good start”),
and
* outlawing child labor and abortion.

That’s about it, folks. Creaming the argument that conservatives are Nazis is easy. What most of us forget is that it’s even easier to make the point that our opponents are more Nazi-like than we are. This point needs to be made more often.

That’s why we call her HITLERY.

RWR

Posted in Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Thompson on Gun Control

Posted by RightWingRocker on October 30, 2007

David over at The Gun Nut was able to get this statement from Fred Thompson on gun control, specifically the UN’s position with regard to it:

Last year, the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights declared that international human rights law requires all nations to adopt strict gun control laws. These “minimum” provisions are much more restrictive than any of those on the books anywhere in the U.S. and would almost certainly violate the Second Amendment of our Constitution.

Besides concluding that all nations are obligated under international human rights law to control the small arms and light weapons to which its civilian population has access, the UN report remarkably denied the existence of any human right to self-defense, evidently overlooking the work of Hugo Grotius, the 17th century scholar credited as the founder of international law, who wrote, “It is to be observed that [the] Right of Self-Defence, arises directly and immediately from the Care of our own Preservation, which Nature recommends to every one. . . ,” and that this right is so primary, that it cannot be denied on the basis that it is not “expressly set forth.”

There is another disturbing aspect to this call for international global gun control. Throughout modern history, the forced disarmament of people by its government has often been accompanied or followed by that government’s commission of often massive human rights abuses. In fact, no genocide in the 20th century occurred when the victim population still possessed small arms, legally or illegally, with which to defend themselves.

So now the UN wants to disarm civilians? Where was the UN when the massacres in Rwanda occurred? What did the UN do to protect the victims of ethnic massacres in Bosnia? Disarming civilians under the guise of international human rights law will only lead to more such genocides by ensuring that civilians can never defend themselves! It would be funny if it weren’t so perverse.

Thankfully, the Framers of our Constitution recognized this potential peril to our liberty, and enshrined in our Second Amendment the more basic right of self-defense. The U.N. can say what it likes about other countries’ citizens’ possession of small arms being a violation of human rights law, but so long as the United States is a sovereign nation governed by its Constitution, its words will have no effect here. And I am glad for it.

I don’t care who you support for the presidency. This position is precisely correct, and as such is, and of right ought to be, a MINIMUM requirement for anyone wishing to hold the office of President of the United States.

America will be wise to accept no less.

RWR

Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Who Said It?

Posted by RightWingRocker on October 20, 2007

April, one of the newer readers here, recently asked me to do this, and voila!, Delfts puts it up.

Now he’s been quiet lately – dealing with some big-time health issues – to the point that he’s now listed in the “Silent MajoRWRity” section (which does need to be worked on, as there are other voiced that have returned), but this quiz should give you really good insight into the mind of the Left. No cheating. I’ll post the answers in the near future. Leave your guesses in the comment area.

1) “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above

2) “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few…and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity.”

A. Lenin
B. Mussolini
C. Idi Amin
D. None of the Above

3) “(We)…can’t just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.”

A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above

4) “We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own…in order to create this common ground.”

A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above

5) “I certainly think the free-market has failed.”

A. Karl Marx
B. Lenin
C. Molotov
D. None of the above

6) “I think it’s time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched.”

A. Pinochet
B. Milosevic
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above

Good luck!

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

A Reasonable Liberal

Posted by RightWingRocker on October 19, 2007

OK, so I bait the hook for the trolls and they don’t show up. Guess the heat in the kitchen was too hot for them.

Instead, I get a reasonable liberal (read the thread on the last post). Reasonable meaning one who’s willing to actually come here and have a debate instead of just being a dickhead and a loser.

Someone has actually decided to try taking TripleNeck’s challenge.

Great.

First of all, let me say that Matt has done a great job in trying to get me to understand that there’s nothing wrong with what he believes. He has failed, though, because he hasn’t shown me that what he believes is in any way good for America, friendly to the philosophy of the Founders, or even legal under the Constitution to begin with.

Matt has admitted to being in favor of:

* Nationalized socialized healthcare
* Nationalized socialized education
* Nationalized socialized Socialist Security
* Nationalized socialized MediScare
* Illegal gun control laws
* Restricting the religious freedoms of some Christians

He has NOT:

* Encouraged race-baiting
* Championed non-existent rights for illegal aliens
* Engaged in Bush Derangement Syndrome-like bullshit
* Made any false accusations with regard to the War on Terror
* Invoked children

Areas we just can’t be sure about:

* Whether all-out socialism is really what he’s about. He said he doesn’t advocate socialism, but somehow found it quite all right to say he’s for much of the socialist agenda.
* Whether he believes the federal government should be responsible for the well-being and livelihood of the people living in the United States of America.
* Whether he holds any disdain for people with money.

I got a chuckle out of his idea that I shouldn’t refer to his party’s likely standard-bearer as “Hitlery”. My fusion of her name with that of ol’ Uncle Adolf is DELIBERATE. I do it to illustrate the truth about her ideology. If she’s allowed to do everything she wants to do (and the American people had better stand firmly in her way), you’re looking at Nazi Germany all over again. Exactly where do you think she gets away thinking stuff like Hitlerycare is ok? Even Matt, the “reasonable” liberal, supports that Nazi scheme.

I won’t beat up too terribly on Matt, though. He was a good sport and defended his positions without the usual liberal name-calling. Of course, his defense of these positions was flimsy at best, and reflected much of the usual “people shouldn’t have to be swamped with bills just because they got sick” kind of drivel. The idea that people get so swamped with bills because oppressive government regulation (largely from the fed) has made doctors so expensive seems to h ave never occurred to him.

As for the trolls, the hook remains baited. Any idiots care to take a taste??

RWR

Posted in Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit | Leave a Comment »

You’d Think They’d Be Proud

Posted by RightWingRocker on October 3, 2007

I have been silent since Saturday on purpose.

My last post was intended to give liberal commentators the opportunity to defend or substantively deny a number of allegations I often make about their beliefs.  Specifically, I asserted that liberals:

  • Encourage race-baiting, giving their full support to racist statements and diatribes that come from the likes of Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, and Robert Byrd.
  • Champion the “rights” of millions of illegal aliens who refuse to obey our laws, organize violent gangs in our country, and have openly asserted that America is part of THEIR country that they are going to take back.
  • Openly believe that the purpose of government is to provide the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens.
  • Are so completely taken over with Bush Derangement Syndrome that they can’t help but blame this President for everything that they see as wrong, including high gas prices.
  • Openly try to accuse the president of starting a war for personal gain (implying that any gains should be redistributed to the people).
  • Openly advocate nationalizing everything from health care to the price of milk.
  • Openly advocate high taxes so that they can decide who to give the money to.
  • Expect the rest of us to assume that everything can and should be done by the federal government.
  • Treat wealthy people and their money with disdain.
  • Expect the federal government to run all of the schools.
  • Justify the imposition of their socialist agenda by invoking children.
  • Constantly bemoan anyone’s practice of religious freedom.
  • Want a centralized government to run all of the above.

Not a single liberal, including the loudmouth who’s been hanging around here lately, has challenged a single one of these assertions.  Why?  Most likely because they know two things: (1) That I am right in asserting that these are their beliefs, and (2) That these beliefs are indefensible.  Otherwise, they’d be commenting in droves about how I was either wrong or that these beliefs were the right and proper course for America.

So, instead of defending their positions or demonstrating where I have erred, they either stand silent or call me a Nazi.

Yeah right.

RWR

Posted in Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Annoying Liberals

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 29, 2007

It’s been a while since we’ve had a liberal around for intelligent discourse. Of late, though, we have had a barking moonbat who seems to get his talking points from Cindy Sheehag, MoveOn and the “Truthers”. OK, well so much for intelligent discourse, but there’s always fun to be had slapping a lib around with the Immortal Cluebat, especially one that comes to a gun fight armed with a slingshot.

These liberals have no concept of reality. They love to tell you that constitutionalists are a dying breed, and wow, what a great thing that is. They love to tell you President Reagan was a moron, despite all his achievements while in office. They love to tell you that war is illegal. In a nutshell, to them the laughable is reality, and reality is, well, they wouldn’t know reality if it slapped them in the face.

How many liberals do you know that encourage race-baiting, giving their full support to racist statements and diatribes that come from the likes of Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, and Robert Byrd?

How many liberals do you know that champion the “rights” of millions of illegal aliens who refuse to obey our laws, organize violent gangs in our country, and have openly asserted that America is part of THEIR country that they are going to take back?

How many liberals do you know that openly believe that the purpose of government is to provide the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens?

How many liberals do you know that are so completely taken over with Bush Derangement Syndrome that they can’t help but blame this President for everything that they see as wrong, including high gas prices?

How many liberals do you know that openly try to accuse the president of starting a war for personal gain (implying that any gains should be redistributed to the people)?

How many liberals do you know that openly advocate nationalizing everything from health care to the price of milk?

How many liberals do you know that openly advocate high taxes so that they can decide who to give the money to?

How many liberals do you know that expect the rest of us to assume that everything can and should be done by the federal government?

How many liberals do you know that treat wealthy people and their money with disdain?

How many liberals do you know that expect the federal government to run all of the schools?

How many liberals do you know that justify the imposition of their socialist agenda by invoking children?

How many liberals do you know that constantly bemoan anyone’s practice of religious freedom?

How many liberals do you know that want a centralized government to run all of the above?

These are all things about liberals that annoy me. What’s worse is that many of them come here championing these things with no idea how ridiculous they are being by doing so, and refuse to engage in a meaningful discussion of any issues. It’s all a bunch of name-calling and lying on their part.

Constitutionalists are part of a growing movement in America. A movement that is marked by recognition of the failed socialist policies of the 20th century and a desire to champion the ideals of the Founding Fathers. A great thing indeed, and lucky for us, the libs don’t even see it coming.

President Reagan was a genius, and an immensely popular one at that. Demonizing him only discredits the liberals. It’s a fool’s game to label a man a moron when he virtually single-handedly brought down the most evil empire the world had ever seen (ok ok … Marge and JP helped … ), brought a balanced budget to within reach by cutting taxes, and was smart enough to find a way to win re-election with almost a clean sweep.

Wars are going to happen. It’s a simple fact of the world. No one likes them, but when you are attacked by ruthless warriors, you must respond as ruthless warriors. The best way to prevent war is to be more prepared for it than your enemies and be prepared to prove it when they test you. Mr. Bush’s unpopularity with regard to the war is not a positive response to cronies like Cindy Sheehag who oppose the war because the guy at the helm is less of a socialist than they are, but because he stopped fighting long before it was appropriate to do so. He failed to cut off the hand that was feeding the terrorists, as an Iraqi friend of mine once suggested. This president’s willingness to answer the terrorists’ declaration of war with rockets and bombs is admirable. His failure to keep fighting as appropriate is his downfall in this regard.

Of course, no liberal will ever admit that – at least publicly; but watch the leading Donk presidential candidates put forth their plans for the War on Terror, and listen closely to what they will entail. You’re not going to be looking at a cut-n-run strategy from any of them that really want to win.

Libs are annoying. Funny, but annoying. Some of the best laughs I have ever had have come at the expense of liberals being stupid. Remember when Bill Clinton came on TV and told all of America that the Blizzard of ’96 was caused by “global warming”?? I almost suffocated that day.

Funny, but annoying.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

A Wall

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 26, 2007

One of the more humorous examples of libs and their foolishness came today in the comment area after some speculation as to why libs look elsewhere for converts to their communist agenda:

I think it’s more due to the fact that intelligent people quickly (it doesn’t take a year!) realize that talking to people like you is like talking to a wall.The only difference is a wall has a more nuanced sense of the issues, and reasons more clearly than the lot of you.

Intelligent people, for the most part, agree with what we say here, for starters. Nobody who has taken any time at all to read the founding documents of this country could possibly disagree with the basic points we make here post after post. I say “we” because the comments are largely in unison these days. Why? Because liberals know that this is not a place to look for converts. This is a place where the Founders’ vision is revered and celebrated. Those who would dismantle our Constitution and that which has made this country the greatest in the history of mankind know better than to argue with those of us armed with these powerful truths.

Walls don’t reason, dumbass. Sensible people do. Issues are not “nuanced” any more than a John Kerry speech (when looking for what liberals call “nuance” in a Kerry speech, just listen for the lies).

The problem with our liberal friends isn’t that they’re ignorant. It’s that they know so much that isn’t so.

The greatest president of the twentieth century uttered these words in his day. God rest his soul; truer words have never been spoken.

With all the proof that socialism is a useless joke, it’s impossible to go forward without questioning liberals’ motives when they advocate it.

This is by far the greatest and most urgent of the issues we face in America today. What nuance do you need?

RWR

Posted in Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Yet Another Retard

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 18, 2007

Moonbat Monitor has more than his share of trolls. Last fall, he dealt with an idiot in his usual fashion, and did such a bang-up job he posted a special link to the post.

I didn’t realize just how long it had been since I had read it, but I clicked it tonight just for laughs. Lo and behold, another retard had surfaced. With nothing left to go on after the other commentators and I had creamed the other fool, he trumped up a phony accusation of bad grammar on my part (I had joined in the fun of ClueBatting the original retard for misspelling a word to the point he was using a homonym) obviously figuring that since the post was almost five months old, that I’d never see it.

eftwingmuthafucka left…
Thursday, 1 March 2007 11:50 am

~Just a heads up~ “RIGHTWINGROCKER”. When criticizing someone for their use of a misspelled word, you may want to consider using correct grammar to do so.

“I love the way people come around criticizing people’s intelligence and in the same breath misspelling SIMPLE WORDS to the point they’re using homonyms.”

I believe it would be “misspell SIMPLE WORDS” not “misspelling”. It concerns me that you teach seventh graders. Hopefully it’s math and not english.

All I could do was laugh. This guy criticized my correct grammar with all of the confidence of a 911Truther. He just knew he was right, even though the proof to the contrary was right there.

Enjoy my response:

You would be well-advised to take The Daily Carrier’s advice, as given to “The Capt.”

“When you find yourself in a hole, QUIT DIGGING!!!!!”

Let’s analyze my alleged failure to use “correct grammar” …

Here is what I said, even as you quoted it:

“I love the way people come around criticizing people’s intelligence and in the same breath misspelling SIMPLE WORDS to the point they’re using homonyms.”

… and your attempt at a correction …

I believe it would be “misspell SIMPLE WORDS” not “misspelling”

Actually, you can congratulate yourself for having the agility to insert your foot directly into your mouth, idiot.

Let’s have a little lesson on what is known as “parallel construction”, shall we??

What you see, if you can get yourself to understand this, is actually TWO sentences (connected by the word “and”). They are:

“I love the way people come around criticizing people’s intelligence.”

and

“I love the way people come around misspelling SIMPLE WORDS to the point they’re using homonyms.”

When adding a conjunction and combining the sentences together, you must keep the cases of the verbs the same – CRITICIZING and MISSPELLING.

So, hopefully you’re not out there educating our youth about anything to do with the language, because you obviously have no clue whatsoever.

Fuck you.

RWR

Indeed. Moonbat Monitor sure gets some loonies.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

Idiocy Revisited

Posted by RightWingRocker on September 10, 2007

Well, surfing about this afternoon, I came across this:

What a gas!

Let’s have a little fun with this, shall we?

People are dying in a war based on inaccurate facts.

OK. Someone hand this idiot a dictionary, and quick.

Facts, by definition are NOT inaccurate. And what facts are you disputing anyway? Osama bin Laden ordered the massacre of thousands of Americans, and we are to sit idly by? Saddam Hussein offers big cash rewards to the families of suicide bombers for killing Americans, and we are supposed to just laugh it up?

These people are against disarming the likes of bin Laden and Hussein, but they have absolutely NO PROBLEM with advocating laws that disarm innocent Americans who have a legally protected right to arm themselves. What kind of fucked up logic is that???

Our government is corrupt.

Go figure. So is every other government that has existed in the history of this world. Are you going to tell me that the Bush Administration is more corrupt than the Hussein regime?? Get real.

Gas prices still keep going up.

Blame that on liberal enviro-nut regulation. Hey, if your corrupt government officials gave two shits about your gas prices, they could shave 18 cents per gallon off the price TOMORROW with ONE VOTE. Instead they complain about how Americans are selfish with their energy use. What fucking hypocrites.

Homes are being destroyed in natural disasters.

Um … What exactly is your point here? Are you trying to say that living in an area prone to, say, earthquakes, doesn’t make your home a target for destruction by mother nature? If someone builds a house in a flood zone, he runs the risk of losing his home in a flood … even if he buys flood insurance – go figure.

It’s just that damned Mother Nature. If we would all just drive hybrids, she just might stop tearing up our towns with tornadoes, floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes. Are we seeing the lunacy here yet?

Children are being abused by their families.

So what’s your answer?? Taking all the kids from their parents so the government can abuse them even more? Is there anyone left that buys this bleeding heart bullshit?

The local pedophile may be a priest.

He/she may also be a teacher, principal, bartender, automobile salesman, garbage truck driver, secretary, or dentist. What exactly is your point?

Poverty still exists even though we are the richest nation in the world.

Again, SO FUCKING WHAT? We are also the country with the most opportunity for those same impoverished people to overcome that poverty. The fact that they choose not to isn’t anyone’s fault but their own.

There is still no cure for AIDS.

Nope there isn’t – and there’s also no cure for heart disease or lung cancer, both of which are more dangerous and innocently spread than AIDS. Yet how much more attention (and unconstitutional money) does AIDS get, even though it’s spread behaviorally?

Yet another Bush could still become our President.

With your luck, it’ll be Jenna. I wonder why you’re not so worried about an anti-American socialist named Hitlery becoming president … That would be “another” Clinton, and a much more dangerous one at that.

All this and you’re still going to focus on my sexuality?

I haven’t said anything about your sexuality. Quite frankly, I couldn’t give two shits.

Someone smack this moron.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, RWR in the 'Sphere, RWRants, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »