RightWingRocker

Never mind the pajamas … We blog in the nude!

Archive for February, 2007

The Left’s REAL Agenda

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 28, 2007

Kim du Toit is an absolute expert on the Second Amendment.

His wife is no slouch, either.

Last week, she took on Jim Zumbo, a Hollywood idiot who took the position that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to protect hunters. She started by quoting a previous post of hers, in which she had had this to say:

Others argue that the Second Amendment was added to allow sportsman to hunt or to shoot at cups and saucers. This camp argues that it was never intended that you have arms to shoot at a person, or in your defense, it was only a protection for hobbyists and hunting enthusiasts.

This idiot (Zumbo) apparently changed his position on the “assault weapons” ban because he didn’t realize that hunters used them. What a moron.

He was rightly buried by Second Amendment supporters for his prior remarks. He was fired by OLN and Remington, for whom he had been doing shows and such. All relevant sponsors cancelled their endorsements. He really took it on the chin. Good.

So why didn’t the truth sink in?? Who knows? Mrs. dT gave him a blunt reminder:

The Second Amendment, which articulates your “right to bear arms,” has NOTHING TO DO WITH HUNTING.

This will be added to the list of random quotes I post at the top of the page. It’s one of the most important things people need to know about the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment was instituted to empower every day people like you and me to kill those who would try to wrest our rights and freedoms from our hands. It gives us the right to own and use weapons of all sorts in an effort to protect ourselves from criminals of all sorts.

This isn’t just for defending our homes against intruders. It’s for killing agents of an oppressive government which makes illegal laws, levies illegal taxes, confiscates private property, etc. Are you getting the picture?

As I thought about this, something very dark and profound came to mind, and the direction of my post changed drastically.

Before I explain myself, there’s something from Mrs. du Toit’s post that must be brought forth, as I will need to reference

it later, and smoothly:

…we ALSO understand the order of bringing about change is the four boxes:
1. Soap
2. Ballot
3. Jury
4. Cartridge

In that order and never getting to the last until the first three boxes are completely and entirely gone from us.

You see, all this brings us to the real reason the anti-Second Amendment crowd is so vocal and pushy.

This crowd, largely socialist, communist, and “liberal”,can see quite well that people are starting to see and feel the effects of their illegal laws, punitive taxes, confiscation of property, etc. The first three “boxes” are wearing down quickly, and the point of having to use the “cartridge box” is fast approaching. The more guilt they can instill in people who choose to own guns and those who are thinking about it, the better for their cause. The fewer armed Americans there are, the easiser it will be to bring their plans to full implementation.

Face it. There are only two kinds of anti-gun loonies – (1) the kind who are out to get as many guns away from as many Americans as possible in order to make it easy to oppress those same people, and (2) the kind who have been fooled by those same loonies into believing that their intentions are honorable. These people play on people’s emotions, bringing forth images of violent crime, dead children, and, of course, everyone’s favorite anti-gun icon, Bambi. They pretend to have compassion for the innocent, weak, downtrodden, and defenseless, and in the same breath seek to increase the number of innocent, wear, downtrodden, and defenseless that they can have compassion for.

No surprise. This is the tactic liberals use for all of their foolish schemes. The dream up something that people will view as a crisis (take your pick – Animal rights, illegal aliens, failing schools, AIDS, global warming – whoops, sorry they call this “global climate change” now because they can’t conclude that it’s consistently “warming” anymore – sorry about that, insane people in asylums and the resulting bums in the street – er, “homeless” – once they closed down the asylums, pollution, and the list goes on …), figure out a way people will be so emotionally affected by it that they will spend their hard-earned money to stop it, use that money and the voices of those who they’ve fooled to shout down politicians and convince them to spend everyone else’s money on it, and from there create jobs in government for people who are trained to “solve” the applicable “crisis”.

Over time, the public sector grows at the expense of the private sector, and these people dream up ways to incorporate what used to be the private sector into the public sector. Eventually, they hope, there will be no more private sector at all, and once that has happened, their socialism has won the day.

If they’ve taken the guns, the people have no means of rising up to defend against this. Oh, and the police and military that are paid (by the oppressed) to do the bidding of the oppressors STILL WILL BE ARMED.

Now some liberidiot nutjob will probably make a stop into the comment area and ask why, if these people intend to use the military to oppress people, these same people are largely “anti-war”.

The answer is simple. They are NOT anti-war. They are simply using war as a pity scheme in the crisis scenario shown above. They use war to bring forth people’s pity for those who die in it in the hopes that people will rise up against the war. Remember that the War on Terror (and that includes the Iraq front) is a means of retaliating against those who have attacked us, as well as spreading FREEDOM in the hopes that those attempting to oppress us from without will either decline in number, leave us alone, or die. If this war were about spreading SOCIALISM, they’d have no problem with it whatsoever.

Just read any thread at DU for the proof.

The real motivation for the anti-gun crowd to be so vocal and steadfast is not that they think people shouldn’t carry guns. It’s because they believe that they are better qualified that you or I to decide who should be carrying them,and they want to be able to impose that belief upon us, whether we like it or not …

Just like they do when they take our lives (Roe v. Wade), our fortunes (the tax code), and our sacred honor (McCain-Feingold).

I say this from my “soab box”. I also proudly use my “ballot box” at every opportunity. The “jury box” is a joke because those who choose the juries represent the oppressors.

With the state things are in today, especially given the oppressive and illegal gun laws there are in this country, using the “cartridge box” cannot be all that far off. Those first three boxes are indeed nearly completely and entirely gone from us. Thus, we must remember:

We, collectively, give our government a tremendous amount of our trust. We give them the power to make and enforce laws. We give them the power to incarcerate those among us who refuse to abide by those laws. With that trust we demand only the commensurate, reciprocal trust: You may make war against us, so we retain the right and the means to make war against you. It is a permanent and perpetual stand off. It is a mutual destruction pact.

Unfortunatetly, I cannot agree with her next statement about not ever expecting to need to go to war with our own government. In fact, if Hitlery finds a way into the White House (which I thank God is highly unlikely), I’m certain it will be absolutely necessary. Our government doesn’t fear us anymore, and that is reason enough.

RWR

Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

While I’m Working

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 27, 2007

… on this, check out the Emperor’s recent comments on the fight the South-of-the-Border idiots are picking.

The title sums it up pretty well –
<a href=”http://www.nicedoggie.net/2007/?p=221″&gt;
How About You Shut the Fuck Up Before We Get Angry, Pendejos?</a>

It’s one of his many home runs …

Maybe I’ll get my two cents in again on this issue sometime soon.

RWR

Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit | Leave a Comment »

Yo

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 26, 2007

Working on something I think may be pretty hot.

Stay tuned …

RWR

Posted in Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, New FedeRWRalism | Leave a Comment »

Jim at PRS Lets Pelosi Have It

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 24, 2007

I haven’t laughed this hard in a long time.

Jim over at Parkway Rest Stop runs these “Dear Nancy” and “Dear Hitlery” features that are incredibly hilarious.

This week, his satire gives us a look into what a call to the White House by Speakerette Pelosi might be like. I damned near shit myself!

The funny thing is that he has hit it spot on – to the point you would absolutely believe that the phone call actually took place.

Jim-

Do you know something we don’t???

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

The Latest from MoveOn

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 22, 2007

In all honesty, I’ve been quite bored with what I’m finding in the blogosphere lately. I’m going to have to revise the BlogRWRoll a bit and find some more interesting material. So bored have I been, I resorted to stopping by MoveOn.org today. Talk about laughs! Check this shit!

It’s time to take on Fox The Democratic Party of Nevada just announced plans to team up with Fox News for a presidential primary debate. But Fox isn’t a legitimate news channel. It’s a right-wing mouthpiece like Rush Limbaugh and the Drudge Report—repeating false Republican talking points to smear Democrats. Sign this petition to ask the Democratic Party of Nevada to drop Fox from the debate.

Hmmm … Ain’t that the nutties freaking thing you everf heard of?? Fair and balanced Fox is a right-wing mouthpiece repeating false Republican talking points to smear Democrats. What a joke!

As if false talking points are even necessary to smear the Donks! If you wanna smear the Donks, just tell the damned TRUTH about them!

Isn’t it convenient that these people advocate free speech for everyone in America except those who disagree with them?

Oh, and what about the left-wing mouthpieces known as ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN. Even if Fox were a “right-wing mouthpiece”, I’d say we’re outnumbered by about 5 to 1 on TV. Are they asking for their news outlets to be dropped from the debate? Idiots.

Save NPR and PBS once and for all President Bush just proposed drastic cuts to NPR and PBS. We’ve stopped similar cuts in the past, but enough is enough: With the new Congress, we can make sure this never happens again. Sign this petition to Congress.

Whatever. Socialist loonies will do whatever they can to take people’s money and spend it on their stupid little unconstitutional projects like NPR and PBS. My question is this: Exactly why can’t these “networks” simply compete in the free market like all the others? I can’t seem to remember.

Isn’t it convenient that these wackos don’t seem to give two shits what the Constitution actually authorizes?

Nutcases.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness | Leave a Comment »

Abortion Survivor Goes Home

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 20, 2007

A baby born at just under 22 weeks gestation is going home today.

Viability? My ass.

RWR

H/T to BethW for the link.

Posted in Conservative Wins, Liberal Bullshit | Leave a Comment »

Go Barack Go!

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 18, 2007

OK it’s official. Barack Obama is running for President.

Not that it’s any suprise. That seems to be the Senators’ thing to do these days, and the way the MSM fawned all over Obama at the 2004 DNC convention, you’d think he already WAS the President of the United States.

After reading Ann Coulter’s column this week, I decided to have a look-see into the actual speech given by Obama when he announced. This guy’s so full of it he could fertilize all the farms in the US from now to the 2008 election.

By the time there was any substance at all to his speech, he was invoking the name of one of the greatest presidents in our history.

And that is why, in the shadow of the Old State Capitol, where Lincoln once called on a divided house to stand together, where common hopes and common dreams still, I stand before you today to announce my candidacy for President of the United States.

As if “B.O.” has anywhere near that sort of potential. HA. Then he said this:

I recognize there is a certain presumptuousness – a certain audacity – to this announcement.

I’d say there’s defintiely a certain audacity in invoking the name of a great Republican when you’re announcing your candidacy for the Democrat Party, chnges over time notwithstanding. Here’s what he said about the Founders:

The genius of our founders is that they designed a system of government that can be changed.

How’s THAT for silly Donk philosophy? Our founders’ genius lies in the “flexibility” of the government they set up.

Barack, I have news for you: very big news. The genius of our founders is that they designed a system of government that made the people of this great country the most powerful level of government, while making the fed the weakest. How can you call yourself a “constitutional scholar” and spew this sickness in the very same speech? Here’s that whole paragraph. It’s really kind of sick.

The genius of our founders is that they designed a system of government that can be changed. And we should take heart, because we’ve changed this country before. In the face of tyranny, a band of patriots brought an Empire to its knees. In the face of secession, we unified a nation and set the captives free. In the face of Depression, we put people back to work and lifted millions out of poverty. We welcomed immigrants to our shores, we opened railroads to the west, we landed a man on the moon, and we heard a King’s call to let justice roll down like water, and righteousness like a mighty stream.

Each and every time, a new generation has risen up and done what’s needed to be done. Today we are called once more – and it is time for our generation to answer that call.

So we’re to believe that while we are proud to have brought an empire to its knees (Revolutionary War), unified a nation without slavery (Civil War), and put people back to work lifting millions out of poverty (Second World War), we should trust ANY candidate that is nominated by this anti-war party? Now THAT is sick.

Furthermore, Obama has stood against the War on Terror especially the Iraq front, except for one stance against surrender in June 2006.

* Longtime critic of Iraq war. (Nov 2006)
* Saddam did not own and was not providing WMD to terrorists. (Oct 2004)
* Initial military was extraordinarily successful in Iraq. (Oct 2004)
* Invading Iraq was a bad strategic blunder. (Oct 2004)
* We must make sure that Iraq is stable having gone in there. (Oct 2004)
* Advance the training speed and get the reconstruction moving. (Oct 2004)
* Democratizing Iraq will be more difficult than Afghanistan. (Oct 2004)
* Terrorists are in Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Iran. (Oct 2004)
* Never fudge numbers or shade the truth about war. (Jul 2004)
* Set a new tone to internationalize the Iraqi reconstruction. (Jul 2004)
* Iraq war was sincere but misguided, ideologically driven. (Jul 2004)
* Would have voted no to authorize the President to go to war. (Jul 2004)
* Problems with current Israeli policy. (Jul 2004)
* Not opposed to all wars, but opposed to the war in Iraq. (Jul 2004)
* International voice in Iraq in exchange for debt forgiveness. (Jul 2004)
* Engage North Korea in 6-party talks. (Jul 2004)
* Use moral authority to work towards Middle East peace. (Jul 2004)
* Voted NO on redeploying troops out of Iraq by July 2007. (Jun 2006)
* Voted YES on investigating contract awards in Iraq & Afghanistan. (Nov 2005)

What are we supposed to do with THAT? He gives us a tribute to great wartime Americans and a great wartime president, and we’re supposed to elect him with his anti-war record? Sick.

Click on that same link for a look at how well Obama lives up to what he says here:

I became a civil rights lawyer, and taught constitutional law

How qualified is this man to teach constitutional law? Well, let’s check it out, shall we?

* Supports Roe v. Wade. (Jul 1998)
* Supports federal programs to protect rural economy. (May 2004)
* Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)
* Supports affirmative action in colleges and government. (Jul 1998)
* Tax incentives for corporate responsibility. (Jun 2004)
* Close tax loopholes for US companies relocating abroad. (Jun 2004)
* REAL USA Plan: Reward companies that create domestic jobs. (Jun 2004)
* Guarantee affordable life-long, top-notch education. (Jun 2006)
* Sponsored legislations that recruit and reward good teachers. (Sep 2004)
* Provide decent funding and get rid of anti-intellectualism. (Jul 2004)
* Address the growing achievement gap between students. (May 2004)
* Will add 25,000 teachers in high-need areas. (May 2004)
* Free public college for any student with B-average. (Jul 1998)
* Voted YES on $52M for “21st century community learning centers”. (Oct 2005)
* Voted YES on $5B for grants to local educational agencies. (Oct 2005)

Oh. Here’s a cute one –

* 3-way win: economy, environment, & stop funding terror. (Jun 2006)
* Voted YES on disallowing an oil leasing program in Alaska’s AMWR. (Nov 2005)
* Voted YES on banning drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (Mar 2005)

Hypocrite. Anyway, back to Barack’s unconstitutional scholarship:

*Voted YES on including oil & gas smokestacks in mercury regulations. (Sep 2005)
* Keep guns out of inner cities–but also problem of morality. (Oct 2006)
* Ban semi-automatics, and more possession restrictions. (Jul 1998)
* Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jul 2005)
* Health care tied to balancing costs and taxes nation wide. (Jun 2006)
* Allowing seniors to bulk purchase will save taxpayers’ money. (Oct 2004)
* Crises happen in our lives and healthcare is necessary. (Oct 2004)
* Believes health care is a right, not a privilege for the few. (Sep 2004)
* Lead global fight against AIDS. (Jul 2004)
* Allow prescription drug re-importation. (May 2004)
* Will expand health coverage & allow meds to be re-imported. (May 2004)
* Ensure access to basic care. (Jul 1998)
* Voted YES on expanding enrollment period for Medicare Part D. (Feb 2006)
* Voted YES on increasing Medicaid rebate for producing generics. (Nov 2005)
* Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)
* Extend welfare and Medicaid to immigrants. (Jul 1998)
* Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. (May 2006)
* Overrode federal overtime rules and raised the minimum wage. (Sep 2004)
* Make sure that African-American men have access to jobs. (Jul 2004)
* Fund Trade Adjustment Assistance for service workers too. (Jun 2004)
* Increase IL minimum wage to $6.50 an hour. (Jun 2004)
* Obama will strengthen unions and workers? rights. (May 2004)
* Voted YES on raising the minimum wage to $7.25 rather than $6.25. (Mar 2005)
* Voted NO on permanently repealing the ‘death tax’. (Jun 2006)
* Voted YES on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut. (Feb 2006)
* $100M increase in IL Earned Income Tax Credit. (Jun 2004)

I wouldn’t trust this guy to teach constitutional law to my trash can. Here’s some more hypocrisy, this time on Iraq:

* Initial military was extraordinarily successful in Iraq. (Oct 2004)
* Invading Iraq was a bad strategic blunder. (Oct 2004)

Watching this guy square off against Hitlery is going to be LOTS of fun. I wonder who will win the contest of trying to “out-liberal” the other, given both’s strong tendencies toward unconstitutional socialism.

Of course, no one wonders who will win the primary.

RWR

Posted in Border SecuRWRity, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit | 2 Comments »

Frankenstein Makes It Official – He’s a Socialist Loony!

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 16, 2007

Last year, I predicted that Al Frankenstein would be running for Senate in Minnesota. It was too easy. Any moron could have seen it. Al simply took a page from Hitlery’s book and moved to a state where he figured he was popular enough to win. Since there was really no place that could boast that kind of looniness, he simply went back to the state he grew up in. Any idiot could have figured that one out.

A couple of weeks ago, it was reported that this is exactly what was going on – a year after I predicted it. What I couldn’t have predicted was this guy’s willingness to pull a Mondale and announce to all of the voters in Minnesota just what a fucking crazy socicalist nutcase he is at the getgo. You’d think just maybe he might have learned the only way a liberal can win is to do what Bill Clinton did – lie. Say you’re not liberal. Say you’re not a socialist shitbag with an agenda. Smile into the camera when you’re supposed to be happy about what you’re saying, and by all means cry if that’s what you think the voters want to see. Clinton was the greatest master of this I have ever seen. There are many people who still believe every lie he ever told. They’re everywhere, especially in the “Blue” parts of the country.

So check out this shit. Here’s how Frankenstein announced his candidacy:

Hi, I’m Al Franken. I’m running for the United States Senate here in Minnesota.

I’d like to talk to you about why I’m running.

I’m not a typical politician. I’ve spent my career as a comedian. Minnesotans have a right to be skeptical about whether I’m ready for this challenge, and to wonder how seriously I would take the responsibility that I’m asking you to give me.

I want you to know: nothing means more to me than making government work better for the working families of this state, and over the next twenty months I look forward to proving to you that I take these issues seriously.

Dude. No one ever took you seriously, even as a comedian. Frankly, running for Senate is the funniest thing you’ve done in your public life. For once, I’m actually LAUGHING.

Today, however, I want to take a few moments to explain to you why I take these issues personally.

My family moved to Albert Lea from New Jersey when I was four years old. My dad never graduated high school and never had a career as such, but my mom’s father, my grandpa, owned a quilting factory out East and gave my dad a chance to start up a new factory in Albert Lea. After about two years, the factory failed, and we moved up to the Twin Cities.

What a nice way to start out a commie story of woe.

Years later, I asked my dad, “Why Albert Lea?” And he said, “Well, your grandfather wanted to open a factory in the Midwest, and the railroad went through Albert Lea.”

So, I asked him, “Why did the factory fail?”

And he said, “Well, it went through Albert Lea, but it wouldn’t stop.”

That was my dad – great guy, terrible businessman. He got a job as a printing salesman, and my mom worked as a real estate agent. The four of us – I have an older brother, Owen – lived in a two-bedroom, one-bath house in St. Louis Park.

Great guy, maybe. Terrible businessman, sure. But I’ll tell you one thing. Even that lame-ass excuse for a joke is better than anything Al’s come up with in years. Maybe Old Man Frankenstein should have tried his hand at comedy …

Just a thought …

That was my childhood. I grew up in a hard-working middle class family just like many of yours. And as a middle-class kid growing up in Minnesota back then, I felt like the luckiest kid in the world. And I was.

And here, my good friends, is the essence of liberal thought. You have what you have and live how you live because of the LUCK you have, not because of anything special you or your parents may have actually DONE. It’s life’s lottery. And by being born, you have been FORCED to buy a ticket.

My wife, Franni, whom I met our freshman year of college, wasn’t quite as lucky. When she was seventeen months old, her dad – a decorated veteran of World War II – died in a car accident, leaving her mother, my mother-in-law, widowed with five kids.

My mother-in-law worked in the produce department of a grocery store, but that family made it because of Social Security survivor benefits. Sometimes there wasn’t enough food on the table, sometimes they turned off the heat in the winter – this was in Portland, Maine, almost as cold as Minnesota – but they made it. (my emphasis)

That family made it BECAUSE of Socialist Security? Hmm … Does this fuckwad actually expect me to believe that his mother-in-law was actually the FIRST woman to ever be widowed in America with five kids? Am I supposed to believe that no pre-socialist era woman ever succeeded in raising a family of that size without a handy-dandy husband around to provide for her?

Al, get off the fucking pity party, ok? You’re making me want to barf all over my keyboard. Let’s face it. Men died all the time in the eighteenth century. Many left behind even bigger families than the one you’re talking about. Most of them made out just fine without these socialist programs. Don’t you think Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Adams, et. al., took people like this into consideration when they wrote the Constitution? Don’t you think that if they had seen any merit to the idea of socialism, they’d have expressly included it in the Constitution? Have you even stopped to think about this instead of letting these shitheads into your thought processes and then turning around and regurgitating their sob stories in the hopes of advancing a bullshit agenda? You are full of it, Al, and you can expect you to have your ass handed to you in the election, if not in the primary.

My mother-in-law and every single one of those five kids became a productive member of society. Conservatives like to say that people need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps – and that’s a great idea. But first, you’ve got to have the boots. And the government gave my wife’s family the boots.

You don’t need boots to rake leaves. You don’t even need boots to join the Coast Guard. You want boots? Get out and earn them. You don’t need the government for that. Do you really think people are that helpless and stupid, Al?

That’s what progressives like me believe the government is there for. To provide security for middle-class families like the one I grew up in, and opportunity for working poor families like the one Franni grew up in.

And herein lies the folly of your entire premise. You believe that the government’s purpose (what it’s there for) is to provide (financial) security and (financial) opportunity. Of course, these provisions are only available to “middle-class” and “working poor” families. Everyone else gets to foot the bill.

Mr. Frankenstein, based on your words, I would suppose you haven’t taken the time to read the Declaration of Independence, but let me take a moment to enlighten you as to the philosophy that drives AMERICAN government’s purpose (what it’s there for)

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed … (my emphasis)

So, idiot, we are all equal in our creation, so you can’t treat one person or group of people any differently than you do any other, and that the purpose of government isn’t to provide ANYTHING, but rather to secure the unalienable rights. Get it? NO Socialist security, NO Pell grants, NO free boots. Oh, and the Constitution was written as it was to support this very philosophy, so don’t get started with this crap that the Declaration isn’t what we go by. The Constitution and the Declaration go hand in hand, and if you don’t know that and accept that, you are unfit for office, which we already know you are. If the voters allow you a seat in the Senate, they deserve the fate that accompanies such an un-American deed.

Last year I traveled all over the state of Minnesota … and maybe a few too many Dairy Queens along the way. But most importantly, I talked to Minnesotans and listened.

They told me that they’re sick of politics as usual-and they’re sick of the usual politicians.

So you come on and give them the same socialist politics-as-usual. Start writing your concession speech, Al.

And I’ll tell you what else they told me. It’s different now than it was for me and Franni. When Franni’s sisters were using them to go to college, Pell Grants paid for 90% of a college education. Today, they pay for 40%. And President Bush, with the help of his Republican allies in Congress, have even tried to privatize Social Security. You should have heard Franni when they tried to do that.

Fuck Franni. Since when does anyone in this country have a right to a college education on someone else’s dime? Given that Pell grants and Socialist Security should have never been public sector ventures, I’d say they would be better off in the private sector if they were to exist at all. At least that way people would be responsible for their own success or failure. Isn’t that what America is all about?

It’s different for middle-class families, too. These families are being squeezed harder and harder every year. Maybe you know what it’s like to be one health crisis away from bankruptcy. Maybe you, or your parents or grandparents, can’t afford prescriptions. Maybe you have kids, and you’re worried about paying for their college. Maybe someone you love is in Iraq, and you don’t know how long they’ll have to stay there, or what will happen when they come home.(my emphasis)

Middle-class families today struggle with that feeling of insecurity-the sense that things can fall apart without notice, outside of your control.

Al, wake up. EVERY family struggles with this, including those who we think have the means not to. I myself happen to be one health crisis away from bankruptcy. Hell, make that ANY finincial crisis, health or otherwise. I have kids (two daughters) and yes, I’m worried about paying for their college (and their weddings, etc.). If I didn’t have this ridiculous tax bill to deal with every year, I just might not have so much to worry about. Are you getting the idea?

Your government should have your back. That should be our mission in Washington, the one FDR gave us during another challenging time: freedom from fear.

FDR can go fuck himself. It’s his socialist bullshit that got us into this mess in the first place. How can the government, rightly called by Thomas Paine “in its best state a necessary evil, in its worst state an intolerable one” be trusted to “have my back”? Fuck that. I’ll cover my own back, thank you. And if you loony leftards would simply respect the Second Amendment, I could do it with my own gun.

President Clinton used to say that there’s nothing wrong with America that can’t be fixed by what’s right with America, or, as I would add, by what’s right with Minnesota.

Well, you know, even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Still, doesn’t this quote sound a bit like something President Reagan might say??? Heck, given what we know about Clinton and the truth, can anyone really trust that he even meant it?

We can lead the fight against global warming and dependence on foreign oil by developing new sources of renewable energy – and create good Minnesota jobs in the process.

If, that is, someone can provide conclusive proof that people are responsible for this so-called “global warming”, which hasn’t even conclusively been proven to be happening, let alone to be caused by humans. Al, look at what you are saying. You are saying that some socialaist program is the way to solve a problem that could much more easily be solved by stuffing a sock into Al Gore’s mouth.

There is also no such thing as “renewable energy”. Once energy is used, it’s used. You can’t get it back or “renew” it. You learn that in high school physics. Maybe you should go back for a refresher course.

We can lead the nation in finding life-saving cures by harnessing the potential of stem-cell research.

Sheesh. I’m not even going to go there. Mr. Minority – care to comment????

We can lead the nation by sending someone to the Senate who’ll be a voice for a strong and responsible America, one that uses its relationship with our allies to create a better and more secure world for ourselves and for future generations.

Well, I’d say the last person to be a voice for a strong and responsible America would be Al Frankenstein, or any Donk for that matter, save one that would go against their party line and dismantle the socialism we’ve had crammed down our throats and resolve to win the War on Terror. What’s all this bullshit about allies anyway?? Wouldn’t a strong America be strong enough to succeed without relying on the support of “allies”?? Doesn’t this get back to the independence concept that I’ve been hammering through this whole post? If we are the most worthy country in the world (which we are), and we’re the most powerful country in the world (which we are), then why the fuck do we need allies? Sure, allies would be nice to have, but if they’re all WRONG, then what good are they? Thank God we do have some allies that are right. I wish we could say the same for everyone who seeks or holds public office.

My political hero is Paul Wellstone.

Enough said.

Al, please shut the fuck up before you waste what’s left of your credibility.

I’ll be surprised if this shitweasel wins the primary, but he has no chance of winning the election. Even if he gets lucky and does, can you think of anything funnier than this guy taking the Senate floor and spewing this bullshit?

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, RWRants | Leave a Comment »

Great Debate on TownHall

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 11, 2007

Jonah Goldberg put this up on Friday.

Read the article, but it’s the debate that takes place in the comments section that is truly revealing.  There’s a lot there.  Read it all (I’ll admit I’m not even halfway through).

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, RWR in the 'Sphere | Leave a Comment »

What About Clarence?

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 9, 2007

So I’m out and about the school today checking out the “Black History Month” (I hate this sorry-ass excuse for an “educational celebration”) – checking out all the prominent black Americans that were honored on the various displays …

Dr. King – check.
Kweisi Mfume – check.
Barack the Schlock – check.
Johnnie Cochran – check.
Judith Jameson – check.
Booker T. Washington – check.
Ron Karenga – check.
Frederick Douglass – check.
Romare Bearden – check.
The Tuskegee Airmen – check.
Mae Jamison – check.
Jackie Robinson – check.
Garrett Augustus Morgan – check.
Benjamin Banneker – check.
Mary McLeod Bethure – check.
Zora Neale Hurston – check.
Condoleezza Rice – check.

and a montage that included a small picture of Colin Powell.

Oh and I almost missed the Condi one due to its being so small.

All these names, and the most successful and powerful black American in history, Justice Clarence Thomas, is somehow left out.

OK. We have room in our school hallways to honor socialist assholes like Kweisi Mfume, Barack Obama, and Ron Karenga, but Condi and Colin get relegated to small mentions on small displays, and a real constitutionalist like Clarence Thomas gets left out altogether?

Methinks we have a liberal bias going on here. What else is new?

RWR

Posted in Liberal Bullshit | Leave a Comment »

KABOOM! – Sadr Terrorist Killed

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 6, 2007

The word “terrorist” does not appear in this piece, but one of Sadr’s top asshole fuckwad terrorists has been killed by Iraqi and US forces.

It’s a beautiful day when something like that happens, even if the MSM doesn’t want to call it what it is: a small victory in a huge war.

Ah, well. Par for the course.

RWR

H/T to Emperor Misha for the link.

Posted in Conservative Wins, KABOOM!, MSMadness, TerrorAsses | Leave a Comment »

Rocker Sick Day

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 5, 2007

Sore throat, cough, stuffy head, generally feeling like shit.

You know how it goes …

Say a prayer for me …

RWR

Update: Doctor is keeping me home tomorrow … maybe I can do some blogging if I feel up to it.

Posted in RWRandom Thoughts, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Another RWR Prophecy Comes to Pass

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 3, 2007

I predicted a year ago this would happen.

Al Frankenstein is going to run for Senate. That’s very good news for Republicans if he can win the primary, which is unlikely.

Franken faces major challenges, said Larry Jacobs, a political science professor at the University of Minnesota. Besides needing to establish himself as a serious candidate, Franken has staked out left-wing policies that make it questionable whether he can win independent voters, Jacobs said.

Of course, I made the prediction last January.  It was too easy.  Hitlery moves to New York to run for Senate, the whole while saying she’s not moving there for that reason.  Oh, and if she does run for Senate, it’s not so that she can get some experience for a later run for president … yeah, sure.

Next thing you know here’s Frankenstein moving to Minnesota and saying it’s not so that he can run for Senate there … uh huh, riiiight.

I have called yet another one.  Only a few hundred to go before I catch up with Nostradamus … or is it a few thousand?  Whatever.

RWR

Posted in Funny Shit, Liberal Bullshit | Leave a Comment »

Blogoversary Activities

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 1, 2007

I think I’ll just update the comments on the mirror site at wordpress today.

I’ll be activating comments there as well on new posts. BlogSpot should still be the home for the RWRepublic for now.

RWR

Posted in RWRandom Thoughts, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Blogger’s Blogoversary Gift

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 1, 2007

“You may only do this once …”

That is, you may only skip the “Upgrade to New Blogger” page and move directly to the dashboard once.

This sucks royally.

RWR

Update: Well … so far it seems like it’s been pretty painless … we’ll see how it goes from here…

Posted in RWRandom Thoughts, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Second Blogoversary – Nothing Special Today

Posted by RightWingRocker on February 1, 2007

Maybe later in the day I’ll sit around and reflect on the second year of the RWRepublic, but I’ve got an extended day at work covering for a sick colleague today, so the decision regarding what, if anything, to do will have to come later.

Still, please honor Emperor Misha, the man who passes as my “blogfather” (I really don’t have one, so I honor him since his blog was my inspiration) by checking out this post, an awesome ranting fisk job like no one but the Emperor can do.  I had a great time reading it.

RWR

Posted in Alternative Media, Confronting Libs, Liberal Bullshit, MSMadness, TerrorAsses | 1 Comment »